Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;23(7):1272-1280.
doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02529-x. Epub 2021 Feb 7.

Consensus of the Spanish society of laboratory medicine and the Spanish society of medical oncology on the methodology and criteria for evaluation of circulating tumour markers in breast cancer

Affiliations

Consensus of the Spanish society of laboratory medicine and the Spanish society of medical oncology on the methodology and criteria for evaluation of circulating tumour markers in breast cancer

F Ayala de la Peña et al. Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

The measurement of circulating tumour markers (TMs) for the diagnosis or monitoring of breast cancer has sometimes been considered of limited utility. In addition to the overinterpretation of irrelevant changes in marker levels, the characteristics of the patient, the disease or other pathologies that can modify them are often not considered in their evaluation. On the other hand, there are recent data on the relationship of TMs with molecular subtypes and on their prognostic value, the knowledge of which may improve their clinical utility. This consensus article arises from a collaboration between the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQCML) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). It aims to improve the use and interpretation of circulating TMs in breast cancer. The text summarizes the current knowledge and available evidence on the subject and proposes a series of recommendations mainly focussed on the indication, the frequency of testing and the factors that should be considered for correctly interpreting changes in the levels of TMs.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Breast neoplasms; Carcinoembryonic antigen; Tumor suppressor; p53.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they did not have any conflict of interest related with this project.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example of changes in the levels of a tumour marker in the case of a benign (blue line) or malignant tumour (red line)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Galceran J, Ameijide A, Carulla M, Mateos A, Quiros JR, Rojas D, et al. Cancer incidence in Spain, 2015. Clin Transl Oncol. 2017;19:799–825. doi: 10.1007/s12094-016-1607-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duffy MJ. Serum tumor markers in breast cancer: are they of clinical value? Clin Chem. 2006;52:345–351. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.059832. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, Blayney DW, Ganz PA, Mulvey TM, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1715–1724. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.8375. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gion M, Trevisiol C, Fabricio ASC. Appropriateness of tumor marker request: a case of study. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5:274. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.06.19. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li X, Dai D, Chen B, Tang H, Xie X, Wei W. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of cancer antigen 15–3 and carcinoembryonic antigen in breast cancer: a meta-analysis including 12,993 patients. Dis Markers. 2018;2018:9863092. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances