Authors' reply re: Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial)
- PMID: 33550670
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16640
Authors' reply re: Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial)
Comment on
-
Re: Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy - a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial).BJOG. 2021 Apr;128(5):938. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16644. Epub 2021 Jan 26. BJOG. 2021. PMID: 33496081 No abstract available.
References
-
- Huang MS, Loo ZX, Lin KL, Long CY. Re: Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial). BJOG 2020; https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16644.
-
- van IJsselmuiden MN, van Oudheusden A, Veen J, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder CM, et al. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy - a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial). BJOG 2020;127:1284-93.
-
- DeLancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1717.
-
- Lucot JP, Cosson M, Bader G, Debodinance P, Akladios C, Salet-Lizée D, et al. Safety of vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic mesh sacropexy for cystocele repair: results of the prosthetic pelvic floor repair randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol 2018;74:167-76.
-
- Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Wheeler TL II, Schaffer J, Chen Z, et al. Defining surgical success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:600-9.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical