Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 21:11:594613.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.594613. eCollection 2020.

Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption and Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Francesco Arba  1 , Chiara Rinaldi  2 , Danilo Caimano  2 , Federica Vit  2 , Giorgio Busto  3 , Enrico Fainardi  4
Affiliations

Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption and Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Francesco Arba et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is a complication of reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption is a crucial step toward HT; however, in clinical studies, there is still uncertainty about this relation. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence. Methods: We performed systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies from January 1990 to March 2020 about the relation between BBB disruption and HT in patients with acute ischemic stroke with both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) assessment of BBB. The outcome of interest was HT at follow-up imaging evaluation (within 48 h from symptom onset). We pooled data from available univariate odds ratios (ORs) in random-effects models with DerSimonian-Laird weights and extracted cumulative ORs. Results: We included 30 eligible studies (14 with CT and 16 with MR), N = 2,609 patients, with 88% and 70% of patients included in CT and MR studies treated with acute stroke therapy, respectively. The majority of studies were retrospective and had high or unclear risk of bias. BBB disruption was measured with consistent methodology in CT studies, whereas in MR studies, there was more variability. All CT studies provided a BBB disruption cutoff predictive of HT. Four CT and 10 MR studies were included in the quantitative analysis. We found that BBB disruption was associated with HT with both CT (OR = 3.42; 95%CI = 1.62-7.23) and MR (OR = 9.34; 95%CI = 3.16-27.59). There was a likely publication bias particularly for MR studies. Conclusion: Our results confirm that BBB disruption is associated with HT in both CT and MR studies. Compared with MR, CT has been more uniformly applied in the literature and has resulted in more consistent results. However, more efforts are needed for harmonization of protocols and methodology for implementation of BBB disruption as a neuroradiological marker in clinical practice.

Keywords: blood-brain-barrier; endovascular treatment (EVT); hemorrhagic transformation (HT); intravenous thrombolysis; ischemic stroke; magnetic resoance imaging; perfusion tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flowchart of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relation between BBB and HT in CT studies. BBB, blood–brain barrier; HT, hemorrhagic transformation; CT, computed tomography.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relation between BBB and HT in MR studies. BBB, blood–brain barrier; HT, hemorrhagic transformation; MR, magnetic resonance.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Balami JS, Chen RL, Grunwald IQ, Buchan AM. Neurological complications of acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol. (2011) 10:357–71. 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70313-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whiteley WN, Emberson J, Lees KR, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, et al. Risk of intracerebral haemorrhage with alteplase after acute ischaemic stroke: a secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. (2016) 15:925–33. 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30076-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Del Zoppo GJ. The neurovascular unit in the setting of stroke. J Intern Med. (2010) 267:156–71. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02199.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Warach S, Latour LL. Evidence of reperfusion injury, exacerbated by thrombolytic therapy, in human focal brain ischemia using a novel imaging marker of early blood-brain barrier disruption. Stroke. (2004) 35:2659–61. 10.1161/01.STR.0000144051.32131.09 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khatri R, McKinney AM, Swenson B, Janardhan V. Blood-brain barrier, reperfusion injury, and hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. (2012) 79:S52–S7. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182697e70 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types