Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 20:11:616097.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.616097. eCollection 2020.

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Spasticity After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Spasticity After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Huangling Zeng et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: Spasticity is a common sequela of stroke. The incidence of poststroke spasticity (PSS) has not been systematically reviewed in recent years, and some risk factors remain debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the prevalence and risk factors for PSS. Methods: We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WANFANG and CBM) inception to May 12, 2020. Observational studies summarizing the incidence or risk factors for PSS were included. Only cohort studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. For risk factors examined in at least three different studies, we combined effects into odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: One thousand four hundred sixty-seven studies were retrieved and 23 were involved in meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of spasticity after stroke was 25.3% and that after the first-ever stroke was 26.7%. The incidence of spasticity after the first-ever stroke with paresis was 39.5%. The prevalence of disabling or severe spasticity (MAS ≥ 3) in stroke patients with paresis was 9.4% (95% CI 0.056-0.133), and severe spasticity was 10.3% (95% CI 0.058-0.149). Moderate to severe paresis (OR = 6.573, 95% CI 2.579-16.755, I 2 = 0.0%), hemorrhagic stroke (OR = 1.879, 95% CI 1.418-2.490, I 2 = 27.3%) and sensory disorder were risk factors for PSS. Conclusions: The incidence of PSS was significantly higher in stroke patients with paresis. Patients with moderate to severe paresis and sensory disorder should be closely followed up. The role of hemorrhagic stroke in predicting PSS remains to be further explored.

Keywords: meta-analysis; prevalence; risk factors; spasm; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The literature search and study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot for the prevalence of spasticity in general stoke patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot for the prevalence of spasticity in first-ever stoke patients with paresis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot for the prevalence of disabling or severe spasticity in stoke patients with paresis.

References

    1. GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators . Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. (2018) 392:1736–88. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Virani S, Alonso A, Benjamin E, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, et al. . Heart disease and stroke statistics-2020 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. (2020) 141:e139–596. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000746 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wissel J, Manack A, Brainin MJN. Toward an epidemiology of poststroke spasticity. Neurology. (2013) 80:S13–9. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182762448 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lance JW. Spasticity: disordered motor control. Miami. (1980) 485–500. - PubMed
    1. Pandyan A, Gregoric M, Barnes M, Wood D, Van Wijck F, Burridge J, et al. . Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil. (2005) 27:2–6. 10.1080/09638280400014576 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources