More attention on glial cells to have better recovery after spinal cord injury
- PMID: 33553683
- PMCID: PMC7844125
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100905
More attention on glial cells to have better recovery after spinal cord injury
Abstract
Functional improvement after spinal cord injury remains an unsolved difficulty. Glial scars, a major component of SCI lesions, are very effective in improving the rate of this recovery. Such scars are a result of complex interaction mechanisms involving three major cells, namely, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia. In recent years, scientists have identified two subtypes of reactive astrocytes, namely, A1 astrocytes that induce the rapid death of neurons and oligodendrocytes, and A2 astrocytes that promote neuronal survival. Moreover, recent studies have suggested that the macrophage polarization state is more of a continuum between M1 and M2 macrophages. M1 macrophages that encourage the inflammation process kill their surrounding cells and inhibit cellular proliferation. In contrast, M2 macrophages promote cell proliferation, tissue growth, and regeneration. Furthermore, the ability of oligodendrocyte precursor cells to differentiate into adult oligodendrocytes or even neurons has been reviewed. Here, we first scrutinize recent findings on glial cell subtypes and their beneficial or detrimental effects after spinal cord injury. Second, we discuss how we may be able to help the functional recovery process after injury.
Keywords: A1 astrocyte; A2 astrocyte; CNS, Central Nervous System; M1 and M2 macrophages; OPCs; OPCs, Oligodendrocytes Progenitor Cells; SCI, Spinal Cord Injury; Spinal cord injury.
© 2021 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
I wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. I confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. I further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of authors. I confirm that the authors have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doing I confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property.
Figures




References
-
- Yuqin Y., Nianchun H., Duan J., Dapeng L., Liu C. Neuroprotective effects of sufentanil preconditioning on spinal cord injury in mouse models. Chin. J. Tissue Eng. Res. 2016;20(40):5966–5972.
-
- Balentine J. Pathology of experimental spinal cord trauma. I. The necrotic lesion as a function of vascular injury. Laboratory Invest. J. Tech. Methods Pathol. 1978;39(3):236–253. - PubMed
-
- Hassanzadeh S., Jameie S.B., Mehdizadeh M., Soleimani M., Namjoo Z., Soleimani M. FNDC5 expression in Purkinje neurons of adult male rats with acute spinal cord injury following treatment with methylprednisolone. Neuropeptides. 2018;70:16–25. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources