Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 12;28(6):1270-1274.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa344.

Gender representation in U.S. biomedical informatics leadership and recognition

Ashley C Griffin  1 , Tiffany I Leung  2 , Jessica D Tenenbaum  3 , Arlene E Chung  1   4   5   6
Affiliations

Gender representation in U.S. biomedical informatics leadership and recognition

Ashley C Griffin et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to describe gender representation in leadership and recognition within the U.S. biomedical informatics community.

Materials and methods: Data were collected from public websites or provided by American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) personnel from 2017 to 2019, including gender of membership, directors of academic informatics programs, clinical informatics subspecialty fellowships, AMIA leadership (2014-2019), and AMIA awardees (1993-2019). Differences in gender proportions were calculated using chi-square tests.

Results: Men were more often in leadership positions and award recipients (P < .01). Men led 74.7% (n = 71 of 95) of academic informatics programs and 83.3% (n = 35 of 42) of clinical informatics fellowships. Within AMIA, men held 56.8% (n = 1086 of 1913) of leadership roles and received 64.1% (n = 59 of 92) of awards.

Discussion: As in other STEM fields, leadership and recognition in biomedical informatics is lower for women.

Conclusions: Quantifying gender inequity should inform data-driven strategies to foster diversity and inclusion. Standardized collection and surveillance of demographic data within biomedical informatics is necessary.

Keywords: awards; equity, informatics; gender; leadership.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Proportion of Women in Biomedical Informatics Leadership Roles and Award Recipients (2014-2019)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Barfield WL, Plank-Bazinet JL, Clayton JA.. Advancement of women in the biomedical workforce: insights for success. Acad Med 2016; 91 (8): 1047–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nobel Media AB. Nobel Prize Facts. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/facts/nobel-prize-facts Accessed August 4, 2020.
    1. Lincoln AE, Pincus S, Koster JB, et al.The Matilda effect in science: awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s. Soc Stud Sci 2012; 42 (2): 307–20. - PubMed
    1. Carnes C, Bland C.. Viewpoint: A challenge to academic health centers and the National Institutes of Health to prevent unintended gender bias in the selection of clinical and translational science award leaders. Acad Med 2007; 82 (2): 202–6. - PubMed
    1. Thomas EG, Jayabalasingham B, Collins T, et al.Gender disparities in invited commentary authorship in 2459 medical journals. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2 (10): e1913682. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types