Dislocated intrauterine devices: clinical presentations, diagnosis and management
- PMID: 33555216
- DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2021.1874337
Dislocated intrauterine devices: clinical presentations, diagnosis and management
Abstract
Objective: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are globally one of the most popular methods of contraception. Uterine perforation is one of the most significant complications of IUD use and commonly occurs at the time of IUD insertion rather than presenting as delayed migration. This paper reports a series of 13 cases of displaced IUDs requiring retrieval by laparoscopy or laparotomy. All the IUDs were copper bearing and most perforations occurred immediately after IUD insertion.
Cases: In two patients with sigmoid colon injury and IUD penetration of the appendix, laparoscopic management had failed and laparotomy was necessary owing to severe obliteration of the pelvic cavity. In one patient laparotomy was the preferred surgical approach owing to acute bowel perforation. In the remaining patients, the displaced devices were successfully removed by laparoscopy.
Conclusion: Uterine perforation and IUD migration to the organs in the abdominopelvic cavity are serious complications of IUD insertion and can be successfully managed by laparoscopy, or by laparotomy in the presence of severe pelvic adhesions or unexpected complications.
Keywords: IUDs; Intrauterine devices; laparoscopy; uterine perforation.
Similar articles
-
Perforated intraperitoneal intrauterine contraceptive devices: diagnosis, management, and clinical outcomes.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):596-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.123. Epub 2014 Jan 21. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24462588 Free PMC article.
-
The management of intrauterine devices following uterine perforation.Contraception. 1991 Jan;43(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(91)90128-3. Contraception. 1991. PMID: 1825971
-
Laparoscopic removal of translocated intrauterine contraceptives devices.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Feb;89(2):163-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04686.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982. PMID: 6461352
-
Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. II. Diagnostic methods, prevention, and management.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981 Aug;36(8):401-17. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198108000-00001. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981. PMID: 6455610 Review.
-
Laparoscopic removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device: case and systematic review.Contraception. 2012 Jan;85(1):15-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.04.015. Epub 2011 Jun 11. Contraception. 2012. PMID: 22067801
Cited by
-
Intrauterine device (IUD) migration to the fallopian tube: a rare location for a translocated IUD with no visceral injury.Contracept Reprod Med. 2024 Jul 25;9(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40834-024-00278-8. Contracept Reprod Med. 2024. PMID: 39054493 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of uterocervical angle in intrauterine device displacement cases.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Dec;310(6):3165-3171. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07823-5. Epub 2024 Nov 21. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 39570386
-
Open surgical retrieval of intra-uterine contraceptive device perforating the ileum: A case report.Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Aug;109:108635. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108635. Epub 2023 Aug 6. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023. PMID: 37552923 Free PMC article.
-
Removal of an incarcerated intrauterine device reaching the serosal surface of the uterus by hysteroscopy alone: a case report.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 7;11:1486745. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1486745. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 39839653 Free PMC article.
-
Is It a "Colon Perforation"? A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 10;9:817029. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.817029. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35360735 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources