Evaluation and interpretation of prosthetic joint infection diagnostic investigations
- PMID: 33555351
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-04958-x
Evaluation and interpretation of prosthetic joint infection diagnostic investigations
Abstract
Background: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is considered one of the most successful surgical procedures ever developed. It can successfully provide pain relief, restore joint function, and improve mobility and quality of life. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) presents with a wide variety and severity of signs and symptoms. It remains a major threat to the outcome of TJA procedures and usually necessitates surgical intervention and prolonged courses of antibiotics. Inappropriate treatment of an unrecognized PJI usually ends with unacceptable and sometimes catastrophic results.
The aim: The understanding and evaluation of diagnostic investigations are extremely important to properly diagnose PJI, including frequently unrecognized low-grade infections, and to provide healthcare professionals with needed information for the care of patients affected by this condition. This article aims to review most of the methods available in PJI diagnostics, to emphasize the strengths and the weaknesses of each of them, and to provide a guideline on how to select the surgical treatment strategy based on the level of diagnostic certainty during the evaluation period. To safely accomplish this, it is crucial to be aware of the limitations of each diagnostic modality.
The focus: The emphasis will be on the use and interpretation of the core criteria for PJI diagnosis, including the pathognomonic sinus tract communicating with the implant, purulent synovial fluid, inflammation in the periprosthetic tissue, cell count with differential, microbial growth in the synovial fluid culture, tissue sample cultures, and sonication samples.
Keywords: Diagnostic criteria; Prosthetic joint infection; Prosthetic joint replacement; The algorithm.
References
-
- Goldman AH, Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ, Abdel MP (2019) The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: why are contemporary revision total hip arthroplasties failing? An analysis of 2500 cases. J Arthroplast 34(7S):S11–S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.031 - DOI
-
- Takakubo Y, Pajarinen J, Konttinen YT, Trebse R, Coer A, Mackiewicz M, Takagi M, Gallo J (2011) Does it exist something like long-term tolerance to an implant? Aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty as a result of local failure of tissue homeostasis. In: Fokter SK (ed) Recent advances in arthroplasty. InTech, Rijeka, pp 324–362
-
- Jaekl DJ, Ong KL, Lau EC, Kurtz SM (2012) The epidemiology of total joint arthroplasty infections. In: Trebse R (ed) Infected total joint arthroplasty. The algorithmic approach. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 35–54 - DOI
-
- Jakobsen TH, Eickhardt SR, Gheorghe AG, Stenqvist C, Sønderholm M, Stavnsberg C, Jensen PØ, Odgaard A, Whiteley M, Moser C, Hvolris J, Hougen HP, Bjarnsholt T (2018) Implants induce a new niche for microbiomes. APMIS 126(8):685–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12862 - DOI
-
- Trivellas M, Cross MB (2016) Irrigation and debridement with component retention. In: Kendoff D, Morgan-Jones R, Haddad FS (eds) Periprosthetic joint infections: changing paradigms. Springer International Publishing, Gewerbestrasse, pp 221–228 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
