Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;28(23):29432-29444.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12760-w. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

Does insurance sector development improve environmental quality? Evidence from BRICS

Affiliations

Does insurance sector development improve environmental quality? Evidence from BRICS

Isaac Appiah-Otoo et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

The effect of financial development measured by banks, bonds, and stocks on carbon dioxide emissions (CO2E) has been widely studied while not much is known about the effect of the insurance sector development on CO2E. Thus, this study fills this void by estimating the effect of insurance consumption on CO2E for BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) from 2000 to 2016 using the instrumental variable generalized method of moments model. The findings indicate that, generally, insurance sector development spurs CO2E in BRICS. Specifically, a 10% rise in life insurance development increases BRICS CO2E by 1%. Also, a 10% rise in non-life insurance development increases BRICS CO2E by 4%. Finally, a 10% rise in the composite insurance development index increases BRICS CO2E by 2%. The study further finds that population size, trade openness, and energy consumption drive CO2E in BRICS, while economic growth mitigates CO2E. These results were robust to alternative econometric estimators, and alternative CO2E proxy. Policies that promote green insurance consumption are recommended.

Keywords: BRICS; Carbon emissions; Insurance sector development.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abbasi F, Riaz K (2016) CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: an augmented VAR approach. Energy Policy 90:102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.017 - DOI
    1. Abid M (2016) Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa economies. Util Policy 41:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.06.009 - DOI
    1. Abokyi E, Appiah-Konadu P, Abokyi F, Oteng-Abayie EF (2019) Industrial growth and emissions of CO2 in Ghana: the role of financial development and fossil fuel consumption. Energy Rep 5:1339–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.09.002 - DOI
    1. Acheampong AO (2019) Modelling for insight: does financial development improve environmental quality? Energy Econ 83:156–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.06.025 - DOI
    1. Acheampong AO, Boateng EB (2019) Modelling carbon emission intensity: application of artificial neural network. J Clean Prod 225:833–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.352

LinkOut - more resources