Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 8;19(Suppl 1):15.
doi: 10.1186/s12963-020-00228-x.

Barriers and enablers to reporting pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes in population-based surveys: EN-INDEPTH study

Doris Kwesiga  1   2   3 , Charlotte Tawiah  4 , Md Ali Imam  5 , Adane Kebede Tesega  6   7 , Tryphena Nareeba  8 , Yeetey A K Enuameh  4   9 , Gashaw A Biks  6   7 , Grace Manu  4 , Alexandra Beedle  10 , Nafisa Delwar  5 , Ane B Fisker  11   12   13 , Peter Waiswa  14   15   16 , Joy E Lawn #  10 , Hannah Blencowe #  10 ; Every Newborn-INDEPTH Study Collaborative Group
Affiliations

Barriers and enablers to reporting pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes in population-based surveys: EN-INDEPTH study

Doris Kwesiga et al. Popul Health Metr. .

Abstract

Background: Risks of neonatal death, stillbirth and miscarriage are highest in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where data has most gaps and estimates rely on household surveys, dependent on women reporting these events. Underreporting of pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) is common, but few studies have investigated barriers to reporting these in LMICs. The EN-INDEPTH multi-country study applied qualitative approaches to explore barriers and enablers to reporting pregnancy and APOs in surveys, including individual, community, cultural and interview level factors.

Methods: The study was conducted in five Health and Demographic Surveillance System sites in Guinea-Bissau, Ethiopia, Uganda, Bangladesh and Ghana. Using an interpretative paradigm and phenomenology methodology, 28 focus group discussions were conducted with 82 EN-INDEPTH survey interviewers and supervisors and 172 women between February and August 2018. Thematic analysis was guided by an a priori codebook.

Results: Survey interview processes influenced reporting of pregnancy and APOs. Women found questions about APOs intrusive and of unclear relevance. Across all sites, sociocultural and spiritual beliefs were major barriers to women reporting pregnancy, due to fear that harm would come to their baby. We identified several factors affecting reporting of APOs including reluctance to speak about sad memories and variation in recognition of the baby's value, especially for APOs at earlier gestation. Overlaps in local understanding and terminology for APOs may also contribute to misreporting, for example between miscarriages and stillbirths. Interviewers' skills and training were the keys to enabling respondents to open up, as was privacy during interviews.

Conclusion: Sociocultural beliefs and psycho-social impacts of APOs play a large part in underreporting these events. Interviewers' skills, careful tool development and translation are the keys to obtaining accurate information. Reporting could be improved with clearer explanations of survey purpose and benefits to respondents and enhanced interviewer training on probing, building rapport and empathy.

Keywords: Adverse pregnancy outcomes; Miscarriage; Neonatal; Pregnancy reporting; Stigma; Stillbirth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Location and total number of respondents in the EN-INDEPTH survey and interviews
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Heazell AEP, Siassakos D, Blencowe H, Burden C, Qar Z, Bhutta A, Cacciatore J, Dang N, Das J, Flenady V, et al. Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences. The Lancet. 2016;387:604–616. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00836-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation: Child mortality estimates. 2018. http://www.childmortality.org. [Accessed November 2019].
    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Fiorella Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, Hogan D, Shiekh S, Qureshi ZU, You D, Lawn JE. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2016;4:e98–e108. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avalos AL, Galindo C, Li DK: A systematic review to calculate background miscarriage rates using life table analysis. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology 2012, 94:417-423. - PubMed
    1. Heazell AEP. Stillbirth - a challenge for the 21st century. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources