Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 8;22(1):123.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05062-6.

Efficacy and safety of Shi-style cervical manipulation therapy for treating acute and subacute neck pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations

Efficacy and safety of Shi-style cervical manipulation therapy for treating acute and subacute neck pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Mingcai Zhang et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Neck pain is a common clinical disease, which seriously affects people's mental health and quality of life and results in loss of social productivity. Improving neck pain's curative effect and reducing its recurrence rate are major medical problems. Shi's manipulation therapy has unique advantages and technical features that aid in the diagnosis and treatment of neck pain. Compared with first-line non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment of neck pain, Shi's cervical manipulation lacks the relevant research basis of therapeutic advantage, safety, and satisfaction for treating acute and subacute neck pain. Herein, we aim to confirm our hypothesis in a clinical trial that the safety and efficacy of Shi's cervical manipulation will be more effective, safer, and more satisfactory than NSAIDs to treat acute and subacute neck pain.

Methods: In this multicenter, positive-controlled, randomized clinical trial, traditional analgesic drug (NSAID) is used to evaluate and show that Shi's manipulation is more effective, safe, and satisfactory for treating acute and subacute neck pain. Overall, 240 subjects are randomly divided into the trial and control groups, with both groups treated by the corresponding main intervention method for up to 12 weeks. Clinical data will be collected before the intervention and immediately after the first treatment; at 3 days and 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the intervention; and at 26 and 52 weeks after treatment follow-up of clinical observation index data collection. The clinical observation indices are as follows: (1) cervical pain is the primary observation index, measured by Numerical Rating Scale. The secondary indices include the following: (2) cervical dysfunction index, measured by patient self-evaluation using cervical Neck Disability Index; (3) cervical activity measurement, measured by the cervical vertebra mobility measurement program of Android mobile phone system; (4) overall improvement, measured by patient self-evaluation with SF-36; and (5) satisfactory treatment, determined by patient self-evaluation.

Discussion: We will discuss whether Shi's cervical manipulation has greater advantages in efficacy, safety, and satisfaction of acute and subacute neck pain than traditional NSAIDs, to provide a scientific basis for the dissemination and application of Shi's cervical manipulation.

Trial registration: China Registered Clinical Trial Registration Center ChiCTR1900021371 . Registered on 17 February 2019.

Keywords: Acute neck pain; Diclofenac sodium sustained-release capsules; Effectiveness; Safety; Shi’s cervical manipulation; Subacute neck pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Research flow chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Recommended content for the schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments. #If the subject has had the relevant imaging examination within 3 months and can provide the report form, no additional imaging examination is required. *If the subjects were directly enrolled at the first visit, visit 1 and visit 2 coincided in time, and visit 2 index was taken as the baseline

References

    1. Cohen SP, Hooten WM. Advances in the diagnosis and management of neck pain. BMJ. 2017;358:j3221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3221. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haldeman S, Carroll L, Cassidy JD, Schubert J, Nygren Å. The bone and joint decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and its associated disorders. Spine. 2008;33:S5–S7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181643f40. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:834–848. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0864-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Côté P, van der Velde G, Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, Holm LW, et al. The burden and determinants of neck pain in workers: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:S60–S74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181643ee4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Côté P, Kristman V, Vidmar M, Van Eerd D, Hogg-Johnson S, Beaton D, et al. The prevalence and incidence of work absenteeism involving neck pain: a cohort of Ontario lost-time claimants. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:S192–S198. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181644616. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types