Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;147(3):e20201433.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1433. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

Improving Influenza Vaccination in Children With Comorbidities: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Improving Influenza Vaccination in Children With Comorbidities: A Systematic Review

Daniel A Norman et al. Pediatrics. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Context: Children with medical comorbidities are at greater risk for severe influenza and poorer clinical outcomes. Despite recommendations and funding, influenza vaccine coverage remains inadequate in these children.

Objective: We aimed to systematically review literature assessing interventions targeting influenza vaccine coverage in children with comorbidities and assess the impact on influenza vaccine coverage.

Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and Web of Science databases were searched.

Study selection: Interventions targeting influenza vaccine coverage in children with medical comorbidities.

Data extraction: Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracting studies' methods, interventions, settings, populations, and results. Four reviewers independently assessed risk of bias.

Results: From 961 screened articles, 35 met inclusion criteria. Published studies revealed that influenza vaccine coverage was significantly improved through vaccination reminders and education directed at either patients' parents or providers, as well as by vaccination-related clinic process changes. Interventions improved influenza vaccine coverage by an average 60%, but no significant differences between intervention types were detected. Significant bias and study heterogeneity were also identified, limiting confidence in this effect estimate.

Limitations: A high risk of bias and overall low quality of evidence limited our capacity to assess intervention types and methods.

Conclusions: Interventions were shown to consistently improve influenza vaccine coverage; however, no significant differences in coverage between different intervention types were observed. Future well-designed studies evaluating the effectiveness of different intervention are required to inform future optimal interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Prof Seale has previously received funding from vaccine manufactures for investigator driven research and for presenting at workshops. This funding was not associated with this research; the other authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources