Isolated systolic and diastolic hypertension by the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and risk of cardiovascular disease: a large prospective cohort study
- PMID: 33560057
- DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002805
Isolated systolic and diastolic hypertension by the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and risk of cardiovascular disease: a large prospective cohort study
Abstract
Objective: The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure (BP) guidelines lowered the hypertension threshold from a SBP/DBP level of at least 140/90 mmHg to at least 130/80 mmHg. The cardiovascular impact of isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) and isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) under the new definition remains unclear.
Methods: We used data from the UK Biobank study, which is a prospective population-based cohort study. Participants were categorized into five groups: normal BP, normal high BP, ISH, IDH and systolic and diastolic hypertension. The primary endpoint for this study was the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal ischaemic stroke, nonfatal haemorrhagic stroke and cardiovascular disease (CVD) death. We also explored the results for the above-mentioned CVD outcomes separately. Baseline BP measurements were obtained twice after the participant had been at rest for at least 5 min in a seated position.
Results: We included 385 955 participants who were not taking antihypertensive medications, were free of CVD at baseline and had available data on BP measurements. During a median follow-up of 8.1 years, 8959 CVD events were recorded, including 4729 nonfatal MIs, 2287 nonfatal ischaemic strokes, 813 nonfatal haemorrhagic strokes, and 1826 CVD deaths. According to the hypertension threshold of at least 130/80 mmHg by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, both ISH (hazard ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval 1.27, 1.15) and IDH (hazard ratio 1.28; 95% confidence interval 1.15, 1.43) were significantly associated with a higher overall CVD risk than normal BP. ISH was associated with most CVD risk, except for ischaemic stroke, while the excess CVD risk associated with IDH appeared to be driven mainly by MI and CVD death. We found heterogeneity by sex and age regarding the effects of IDH on overall CVD risk, with significant associations in younger adults (age <60 years) and women and null associations in men and older adults (age ≥60 years).
Conclusion: ISH was associated with the risk of most CVD events, while the association between IDH and CVD risk was mainly driven by MI incidence and CVD death. Further research is needed to identify participants with IDH who have a particular risk for developing CVD.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
The association between isolated systolic or diastolic hypertension and cardiovascular risk.J Hypertens. 2021 Aug 1;39(8):1552-1554. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002857. J Hypertens. 2021. PMID: 34188001 No abstract available.
-
Isolated diastolic hypertension in the UK Biobank: correspondence regarding Isolated systolic and diastolic hypertension by the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and risk of cardiovascular disease: a large prospective cohort study.J Hypertens. 2022 Feb 1;40(2):409-410. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003032. J Hypertens. 2022. PMID: 34992200 No abstract available.
-
Reply.J Hypertens. 2022 Feb 1;40(2):410-411. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003034. J Hypertens. 2022. PMID: 34992201 No abstract available.
References
-
- Verdecchia P, Angeli F. Natural history of hypertension subtypes. Circulation 2005; 111:1094–1096.
-
- Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Himmelfarb CD, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2018; 138:e484–e594.
-
- Mancia G, Corrao G. Global impact of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Hypertension Guidelines: a perspective from Italy. Circulation 2018; 137:889–890.
-
- Wander GS, Ram C. Global impact of 2017 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Hypertension Guidelines: a perspective from India. Circulation 2018; 137:549–550.
-
- Wang JG, Liu L. Global impact of 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Hypertension Guidelines: a perspective from China. Circulation 2018; 137:546–548.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
