Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jun;205(6):1748-1754.
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001638. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: Results of a Randomized Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: Results of a Randomized Trial

E Baten et al. J Urol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to determine whether omitting antimicrobial prophylaxis is safe in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate without preoperative pyuria and a preoperative catheter.

Materials and methods: We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial from September 17, 2017 until December 31, 2019 in 5 hospitals. Patients with pyuria (>100 white blood cells/ml) and a preoperative indwelling catheter were excluded. Postoperative fever was defined as a body temperature ≥38.3C. A noninferiority design was used with a 6% noninferiority margin and null hypothesis (H0) that the infection risk is at least 6% higher in the experimental (E) than in the control (C) group; H0: C (antimicrobial prophylaxis group) - E (no antimicrobial prophylaxis group) ≥ Δ (6% noninferiority margin). A multivariable, logistic regression was performed regarding posttransurethral resection of the prostate fever and antimicrobial prophylaxis with co-variates: (clot-)retention and operating time. The R Project® for statistical computing was used and a p value of 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results: Of the patients 474 were included for multivariable analysis and 211/474 (44.5%) received antimicrobial prophylaxis vs 263/474 (55.5%) patients without antimicrobial prophylaxis. Antibiotics were fluoroquinolones in 140/211 (66.4%), cephazolin in 58/211 (27.5%) and amikacin in 13/211 (6.2%) patients. Fever occurred in 9/211 (4.4%) patients with antimicrobial prophylaxis vs 13/263 (4.9%) without antimicrobial prophylaxis (p=0.8, risk difference 0.006 [95% CI -0.003-0.06, relative risk 1.16]). We were able to exclude a meaningful increase in harm associated with omitting antimicrobial prophylaxis (p=0.4; adjusted risk difference 0.016 [95% CI -0.02-0.05]).

Conclusions: Our data demonstrate the safety of omitting antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate without preoperative pyuria and a preoperative indwelling catheter.

Keywords: antibiotic prophylaxis; drug resistance, microbial; fever; randomized controlled trial; transurethral resection of prostate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Editorial Comment.
    Branch JD. Branch JD. J Urol. 2021 Jun;205(6):1752-1753. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001638.01. Epub 2021 Mar 15. J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33720752 No abstract available.
  • Editorial Comment.
    Dmochowski R. Dmochowski R. J Urol. 2021 Jun;205(6):1753-1754. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001638.02. Epub 2021 Mar 15. J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33720753 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources