Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb 5;13(4):626.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13040626.

Emerging Trends in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Emerging Trends in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer

Ami Patel et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer remains a leading cause of death amongst all gynecologic cancers despite advances in surgical and medical therapy. Historically, patients with ovarian cancer underwent primary tumor reductive surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy; however, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery has gradually become an alternative approach for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer for whom primary tumor reductive surgery is not feasible. Decision-making about the use of these approaches has not been uniform. Hence, it is essential to identify patients who can benefit most from neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery. Several prospective and retrospective studies have proposed potential models to guide upfront decision-making for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. In this review, we summarize important decision-making models that can improve patient selection for personalized treatment. Models based on clinical factors (clinical parameters, radiology studies and laparoscopy scoring) and molecular markers (circulating and tumor-based) are useful, but laparoscopic staging is among the most informative diagnostic methods for upfront decision-making in patients medically fit for surgery. Further research is needed to explore more reliable models to determine personalized treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Keywords: epithelial ovarian cancer; interval tumor reductive surgery; laparoscopy scoring; molecular markers; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; optimal cytoreduction; personalized treatment; radiology-based models; targeted therapy; tumor-based genetic markers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.M.: Research grant, Merck, K.M.: honorarium, Chugai; A.K.S: consulting, Merck, Kiyatec, Astra Zeneca, shareholder BioPath.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trends of neoadjuvant chemotherapy use for advanced ovarian cancer in major U.S. observational studies. Adopted and modified from the author’s own work [11]: Gynecol. Oncol. 2021, 160, 32–39. Matsuo, K., et al. Possible candidate population for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with advanced ovarian cancer. Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer in U.S. observational studies. Copyright (2021) with permission from Elsevier. Proportion of NACT with ovarian cancer per calendar year is shown. Only starting point and end point are shown. Y-axis is truncated to 0–70%. * In the trend analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy without surgery was included [8]. [9]. § [6]. [7]. # [10]. & [11]. Abbreviations: NCDB, National Cancer Database; and SEER, The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results; NCI, National Cancer Institute; U.S., United States of America.

References

    1. National Cancer Institute Ovarian Cancer—Cancer Stat Facts. [(accessed on 21 December 2020)]; Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/ovary.html.
    1. Khairuzzaman M.Q. Cancer Facts & Figures. [(accessed on 21 December 2020)];2020 Available online: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-....
    1. Torre L.A., Trabert B., DeSantis C.E., Miller K.D., Samimi G., Runowicz C.D., Gaudet M.M., Jemal A., Siegel R.L. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:284–296. doi: 10.3322/caac.21456. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grossman D.C., Curry S.J., Owens D.K., Barry M.J., Davidson K.W., Doubeni C.A., Epling J.W., Kemper A.R., Krist A.H., Kurth A.E., et al. Screening for ovarian cancer US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2018;319:588–594. - PubMed
    1. Ebell M.H., Culp M.B., Radke T.J. A Systematic Review of Symptoms for the Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2016;50:384–394. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.023. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources