Effects of Hand Hygiene Using 4% Chlorhexidine Gluconate or Natural Soap During Hand Rubbing Followed by Alcohol-Based 1% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Sanitizer Lotion in the Operating Room
- PMID: 33563102
- PMCID: PMC9831244
- DOI: 10.1089/wound.2020.1352
Effects of Hand Hygiene Using 4% Chlorhexidine Gluconate or Natural Soap During Hand Rubbing Followed by Alcohol-Based 1% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Sanitizer Lotion in the Operating Room
Abstract
Objective: Hand hygiene using either 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) or natural soap during hand rubbing, followed by alcohol-based 1% CHG sanitizer lotion in the operating room was compared to assess bacterial reduction, skin moisture, skin texture, and hand hygiene using qualitative questionnaires. Approach: A crossover study with 36 professional scrub nurses at two medical centers was performed to compare 4% CHG followed by alcohol-based 1% CHG sanitizer lotion, the Two-stage method with handwashing using natural soap followed by alcohol-based 1% CHG sanitizer lotion, and the Waterless method, after a period of 10 days of use. The study completely followed CONSORT, www.consort-statement.org. Results: There was no significant difference in bacterial reduction based on the bacterial colony-forming units between the two methods. The skin moisture and skin roughness scores were not significantly different between the two methods. The Waterless method was significantly better than the Two-stage method regarding "foaming," "quality," "longevity" (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.0001, respectively), but "disappearance" was significantly better by the Two-stage method (p = 0.0095) during washing and rubbing. Immediately after washing and rubbing, the Waterless method was significantly better regarding "tightness" and "moisture," whereas the Two-stage method was significantly better regarding "stickiness" (p = 0.0114, p = <0.0001, and 0.0059, respectively) Innovation: The Waterless method using natural soap during handwashing followed by alcohol-based 1% CHG sanitizer lotion was as effective as the Two-stage method of 4% CHG followed by alcohol-based 1% CHG sanitizer lotion. Conclusion: Handwashing using natural soap is simple and superior to hand scrubbing in several aspects.
Keywords: Two-stage methods; Waterless method; chlorhexidine gluconate; hand rubbing lotion; hand scrubbing; natural soap; surgical-site infection.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest, and ghostwriting services were not used.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of povidone-iodine, povidone-iodine-ethanol and chlorhexidine gluconate-ethanol surgical scrubs.Dermatology. 2006;212 Suppl 1:21-5. doi: 10.1159/000089195. Dermatology. 2006. PMID: 16490971 Clinical Trial.
-
An evaluation of five protocols for surgical handwashing in relation to skin condition and microbial counts.J Hosp Infect. 1997 May;36(1):49-65. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(97)90090-6. J Hosp Infect. 1997. PMID: 9172045 Clinical Trial.
-
A new surgical handwashing and hand antisepsis from scrubbing to rubbing.J Nippon Med Sch. 2004 Jun;71(3):190-7. doi: 10.1272/jnms.71.190. J Nippon Med Sch. 2004. PMID: 15226610
-
Antiseptic efficacies of waterless hand rub, chlorhexidine scrub, and povidone-iodine scrub in surgical settings: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Hosp Infect. 2019 Apr;101(4):370-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Nov 28. J Hosp Infect. 2019. PMID: 30500384
-
Risks and benefits of using chlorhexidine gluconate in handwashing: A systematic literature review.Am J Infect Control. 2019 Jun;47(6):704-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.11.013. Epub 2019 Jan 11. Am J Infect Control. 2019. PMID: 30642673
Cited by
-
Which Surgical Hand Preparation Method Is More Effective? A Comparative Study of Hand Rub and Hand Scrub.Nurs Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(7):242. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15070242. Nurs Rep. 2025. PMID: 40710937 Free PMC article.
-
Natural soap is clinically effective and less toxic and more biodegradable in aquatic organisms and human skin cells than synthetic detergents.PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0324842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324842. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40531955 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. WHO Guideline Series. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009.
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project—statistics on hospital stays. 2013.
-
- Scott RD. The Direct Medical Costs of Healthcare-Associated Infections in U.S. Hospitals and the Benefits of Prevention. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009.
-
- Rahim K, Saleha S, Zhu X, Huo L, Basit A, Franco OL. Bacterial contribution in chronicity of wounds. Microb Ecol 2017;73:710–721. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical