Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 10;18(1):22.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01082-2.

A secondary analysis of the childhood obesity prevention Cochrane Review through a wider determinants of health lens: implications for research funders, researchers, policymakers and practitioners

Affiliations

A secondary analysis of the childhood obesity prevention Cochrane Review through a wider determinants of health lens: implications for research funders, researchers, policymakers and practitioners

James Nobles et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are often regarded as the gold standard of evidence, and subsequently go on to inform policymaking. Cochrane Reviews synthesise this type of evidence to create recommendations for practice, policy, and future research. Here, we critically appraise the RCTs included in the childhood obesity prevention Cochrane Review to understand the focus of these interventions when examined through a wider determinants of health (WDoH) lens.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the interventions included in the Cochrane Review on "Interventions for Preventing Obesity in Children", published since 1993. All 153 RCTs were independently coded by two authors against the WDoH model using an adaptive framework synthesis approach. We used aspects of the Action Mapping Tool from Public Health England to facilitate our coding and to visualise our findings against the 226 perceived causes of obesity.

Results: The proportion of interventions which targeted downstream (e.g. individual and family behaviours) as opposed to upstream (e.g. infrastructure, environmental, policy) determinants has not changed over time (from 1993 to 2015), with most intervention efforts (57.9%) aiming to change individual lifestyle factors via education-based approaches. Almost half of the interventions (45%) targeted two or more levels of the WDoH. Where interventions targeted some of the wider determinants, this was often achieved via upskilling teachers to deliver educational content to children. No notable difference in design or implementation was observed between interventions targeting children of varying ages (0-5 years, 6-12 years, 13-18 years).

Conclusions: This study highlights that interventions, evaluated via RCTs, have persisted to focus on downstream, individualistic determinants of obesity over the last 25 years, despite the step change in our understanding of its complex aetiology. We hope that the findings from our analysis will challenge research funders, researchers, policymakers and practitioners to reflect upon, and critique, the evidence-based paradigm in which we operate, and call for a shift in focus of new evidence which better accounts for the complexity of obesity.

Keywords: Action mapping; Childhood obesity; Intervention design; Prevention; Whole systems approach; Wider determinants of health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

THMM, TB, and CS were involved in the Cochrane Review on “Interventions for Preventing Obesity in Children”. JN was involved in the development of the Public Health England Action Mapping Tool and the broader Whole Systems Obesity programme. The authors have no other competing interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of intervention efforts against the perceived causes of obesity in the context of the WDoH. Panel a represents the distribution of 242 intervention efforts from the 153 studies against the WDoH. Panel b presents the same data as panel a but separated by the date of publication. Panel c presents the same data as panel a but separated by the age of the children targeted by the interventions

References

    1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development . The Heavy Burden of Obesity. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019.
    1. Butland B, Jebb S, Kopelman P, McPherson K, Thomas S, Mardell J, et al. In: Tackling Obesities: Future Choices – Project report. Foresightet al., editors. London: Government Office for Science; 2007. p. 164. - PubMed
    1. Swinburn BA, Kraak VI, Allender S, Atkins VJ, Baker PI, Bogard JR, et al. The global Syndemic of obesity, Undernutrition, and climate change: <em>the lancet</em> commission report. Lancet. 2019;393(10173):791–846. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32822-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. Policy strategies to promote social equity in health. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation; 1991.
    1. Bambra C, Gibson M, Sowden A, Wright K, Whitehead M, Petticrew M. Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(4):284–291. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.082743. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types