How does COVID-19 emergency cognition influence public pro-environmental behavioral intentions? An affective event perspective
- PMID: 33564208
- PMCID: PMC7857117
- DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105467
How does COVID-19 emergency cognition influence public pro-environmental behavioral intentions? An affective event perspective
Abstract
Social impacts and serious damages caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in public introspection on the issue of ecological environmental protection. However, whether the public cognition of COVID-19 can promote pro-environmental behavioral intentions (PEBI) has not yet been determined; this is crucial for studying the ecological significance of the pandemic. Based on the affective events theory (AET), this study investigated the mechanism by which COVID-19 emergency cognition influences public PEBI. Following an analysis of 873 public questionnaires, the results reveal that public cognition of COVID-19 emergency can significantly promote PEBI. Among them, the effect of emergency coping is stronger than that of emergency relevance. Besides, the positive and negative environmental affective reactions aroused by COVID-19 pandemic play a mediating role between the emergency cognition and PEBI. Moreover, the positive environmental affective reactions show a stronger positive effect on household-sphere PEBI. However, the negative environmental affective reactions are more prominent in promoting public-sphere PEBI. This research aims to bridge a research gap by establishing a link between COVID-19 pandemic and PEBI. The findings can provide useful recommendations for policymakers to find the opportunity behind the COVID-19 emergency to promote public PEBI.
Keywords: Affective events theory; COVID-19; Event cognition; Pro-environmental behavioral intentions; Public health emergency; Structural equation model.
© 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior organizational behavior and human decision processes. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991;50:179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T. - DOI
-
- Ashkanasy N.M., Ayoko O.B., Jehn K.A. Understanding the physical environment of work and employee behavior: an affective events perspective. J. Organ. Behav. 2014;35:1169–1184. doi: 10.1002/job.1973. - DOI
-
- Ashton-James C.E., Ashkanasy N.M. What lies beneath? A process analysis of affective events theory. Res. Emot. Organ. 2005;1:23–46. doi: 10.1016/s1746-9791(05)01102-8. - DOI
-
- Bandura A. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educ. Psychol. 1993;28:117–148. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2802. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous