Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun 27;14(1):84-97.
doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa076. eCollection 2021 Jan.

Health claims databases used for kidney research around the world

Affiliations
Review

Health claims databases used for kidney research around the world

Manon J M van Oosten et al. Clin Kidney J. .

Abstract

Health claims databases offer opportunities for studies on large populations of patients with kidney disease and health outcomes in a non-experimental setting. Among others, their unique features enable studies on healthcare costs or on longitudinal, epidemiological data with nationwide coverage. However, health claims databases also have several limitations. Because clinical data and information on renal function are often lacking, the identification of patients with kidney disease depends on the actual presence of diagnosis codes only. Investigating the validity of these data is therefore crucial to assess whether outcomes derived from health claims data are truly meaningful. Also, one should take into account the coverage and content of a health claims database, especially when making international comparisons. In this article, an overview is provided of international health claims databases and their main publications in the area of nephrology. The structure and contents of the Dutch health claims database will be described, as well as an initiative to use the outcomes for research and the development of the Dutch Kidney Atlas. Finally, we will discuss to what extent one might be able to identify patients with kidney disease using health claims databases, as well as their strengths and limitations.

Keywords: CKD; dialysis; epidemiology; health claims data; health claims database; kidney transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Examples of the Dutch Kidney Atlas. (A) Geographical variation of the number of patients with CKD Stages G4–G5 (diagnosis code eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) not treated with RRT by province of The Netherlands, 2017; numbers per million insured population. (B) Total healthcare costs (€) of patients with CKD Stages G4–G5 (diagnosis code eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) not treated with RRT compared with a matched control group (2017, presented for the total group and different age groups). (C) Statin use in prevalent dialysis patients (2017, percentage of the total population), presented for the total group and different age groups. (D) Percentage of kidney transplant patients visiting the emergency department per year (2017), presented for the total group and subgroups based on age and gender.

References

    1. Goldstein BA, Winkelmayer WC.. Comparative health services research across populations: the unused opportunities in big data. Kidney Int 2015; 87: 1094–1096 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kreis K, Neubauer S, Klora M. et al. Status and perspectives of claims data analyses in Germany—a systematic review. Health Policy 2016; 120: 213–226 - PubMed
    1. Ng JYS, Ramadani RV, Hendrawan D. et al. National health insurance databases in Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines. Pharmacoecon Open 2019; 3: 517–526 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bello A, Hemmelgarn B, Manns B. et al. Use of administrative databases for health-care planning in CKD. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27: iii12–iii18 - PubMed
    1. Bello AK, Alrukhaimi M, Ashuntantang GE. et al. Global overview of health systems oversight and financing for kidney care. Kidney Int Suppl 2018; 8: 41–51 - PMC - PubMed