Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 17;5(2):1-11.
doi: 10.1159/000509272. eCollection 2020 May-Aug.

Time for Change? The Why, What and How of Promoting Innovation to Tackle Rare Diseases - Is It Time to Update the EU's Orphan Regulation? And if so, What Should be Changed?

Affiliations

Time for Change? The Why, What and How of Promoting Innovation to Tackle Rare Diseases - Is It Time to Update the EU's Orphan Regulation? And if so, What Should be Changed?

Denis Horgan et al. Biomed Hub. .

Abstract

Since developments are global in the healthcare arena, more should be done to align EU and other big markets' regulatory practices for rare disease patients. Notwithstanding efforts and cooperation between the US and EU aimed to harmonize their strategic plans in the field of orphan drugs, regulatory criteria and procedures to gain the designation, terms and classifications should be still harmonised. Aligning the criteria of prevalence and support to orphan medicines in the various jurisdictions internationally, would facilitate patient recruitment eventually at global level, so as to gain the data and the biological insights required to identify biomarkers and appropriate endpoints needed for progressing clinical development. A conducive regulatory environment can further support the development of medicines to treat rare diseases. Overall there is a need for joined-up regulatory process coordination. Better integration of regulatory pathways and better integration of regulatory systems, such as scientific tools and methods to generate evidence, would be helpful. There is a need to revise and agree the current frameworks to be improved which will take into account the considerations and challenges to diagnose and treat different rare diseases and improve quality of life. Deliberative processes with multi-stakeholders' involvement for reimbursement should be considered. This paper explores the successes and limitation of both the regulation and its implementation mechanisms in the current regulatory context, and suggests some improvements that could maximise its benefits and boost rare disease research even further.

Keywords: Access; Biomarkers; Biosimilars; Challenges; Citizens; Data; Diagnostics; Empowerment; European Commission; Incentives; Inequality; Member states; Orphan regulation; Patient; Patients; Personalised healthcare; Rare disease; Regulatory; Reimbursement; Treatment; Ultra-rare disease; Unmet need.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no competing interests. Ivana Cattaneo is a Novartis employee and has stock options in Novartis.

References

    1. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products. Official J Eur Communities. 2000;43:L18.
    1. Rare Diseases: A Public Health Priority at. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_threats/non_com/rare_diseases_en.htm.
    1. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products. Official J Eur Communities. 2000;43:L18.
    1. Friends of Europe, Event Report, Equal Access to care for rare disease. Summer. 2019.
    1. Director-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission) Science, Research and innovation performance of the EU. 2018. ISBN 978-92-79-69744-9.