Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 14;5(3):182-223.
doi: 10.1159/000511209. eCollection 2020 Sep-Dec.

Bringing Greater Accuracy to Europe's Healthcare Systems: The Unexploited Potential of Biomarker Testing in Oncology

Affiliations

Bringing Greater Accuracy to Europe's Healthcare Systems: The Unexploited Potential of Biomarker Testing in Oncology

Denis Horgan et al. Biomed Hub. .

Abstract

Rapid and continuing advances in biomarker testing are not being matched by take-up in health systems, and this is hampering both patient care and innovation. It also risks costing health systems the opportunity to make their services more efficient and, over time, more economical. This paper sets out the potential of biomarker testing, the unfolding precision and range of possible diagnosis and prediction, and the many obstacles to adoption. It offers case studies of biomarker testing in breast, ovarian, prostate, lung, thyroid and colon cancers, and derives specific lessons as to the potential and actual use of each of them. It also draws lessons about how to improve access and alignment, and to remedy the data deficiencies that impede development. And it suggests solutions to outstanding issues - notably including funding and the tangled web of obtaining reimbursement or equivalent coverage that Europe's fragmented health system implies. It urges a European evolution towards an initial minimum testing scenario, which would guarantee universal access to a suite of biomarker tests for the currently most common conditions, and, further into the future, to an optimum testing scenario in which a much wider range of biomarker tests would be introduced and become part of a more sophisticated health system articulated around personalised medicine. For exploiting genomics to the full, it argues the need for a new policy framework for Europe. Biomarker testing is not an issue that can be treated in isolation, since the purpose of testing is to improve health. Its use is therefore always closely linked to specific health challenges and needs to be viewed in the broader policy context in the EU and more widely. The paper is the result of extensive engagement with experts and decision makers to develop the framework, and consequently represents a wide consensus of views on how healthcare systems should respond from push and pull factors at local, national and cross-border and EU level. It contains strong views and clear recommendations springing from the convictions of patients, clinicians, academics, medicines authorities, HTA bodies, payers, the diagnostic, pharmaceutical and ICT industries, and national policy makers.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Cancer plan; Companion diagnostics; Comprehensive genomic profiling; Diagnostic tests; Million European Genome; Molecular diagnostics; Personalised healthcare; Public health; Reimbursement challenges.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Benjamin Horbach is a Roche employee and has stock options in Roche. Stephen Hall is a Novartis employee and has stock options in Novartis. Benjamin Gannon is a Myriad Genetics employee and has stock options in Myriad. Rocio Varea Menendezis Eli Lilly employee and has stock options in Eli Lilly. Sarah Mee is an AstraZeneca employee and has stock options in AstraZeneca. Susana Banerjee receives grants from Astrazeneca, GSK & Honoraria − Astrazeneca/MSD, Amgen, Clovis, GSK, Mersana, Seattle Genetics, Merck Sereno, Genmab, Roche, Immunogen.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Evaluating the current biomarker testing landscape could improve Europe-wide access by identifying and targeting barriers.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
European Commission's Beating Cancer Plan.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Main areas of barriers.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Index of barriers to PM in Europe [99].
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Involving every stakeholder group is necessary to improve access to testing in the EU.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Matrix of the E-Health Data Solutions.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Revision of the EU medical devices legislation. Adopted on April 5, 2017, publication in OJ-EU, May 5, 2017.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Minimum testing: drivers, problems, objectives, inputs, results and impact.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
VODI − value of diagnostic information.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Tackling the unmet needs in access to biomarkers testing.
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Multi-stakeholder engagement, pragmatism and focus to secure improvement.
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Optimum testing: challenges, objectives, inputs, results and impact.

References

    1. Mayeux R. Biomarkers: potential uses and limitations. NeuroRx. 2004 Apr;1((2)):182–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li AL, Song J. Biomarkers classification and their application in clinical medicine. Zhongguo Yaolixue Yu Dulixue Zazhi. 2015;29:7–13.
    1. European Medicines Agency Committee for Human Medicinal Products. Concept paper on predictive biomarker-based assay development in the context of drug development and lifecycle. 2017. July 20. Cited June 8, 2020. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/concept-pape....
    1. Berns A, Ringborg U, Eggermont A, Baumann M, Calvo F, Eggert A, et al. Towards a Cancer Mission in Horizon Europe. Mol Oncol. 2019 Nov;13((11)):2301–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, on enabling the digital transformation of health and care in the Digital Single Market; empowering citizens and building a healthier society, COM(2018) 233 final. Cited June 8, 2020. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52018DC02....