Reduced Laparoscopic Intra-abdominal Pressure During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Its Effect on Post-operative Pain: a Double-Blinded Randomised Control Trial
- PMID: 33565010
- DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-04919-0
Reduced Laparoscopic Intra-abdominal Pressure During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Its Effect on Post-operative Pain: a Double-Blinded Randomised Control Trial
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic surgery is regarded as the gold standard for the surgical management of cholelithiasis. To improve post-operative pain, low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LPLC) have been trialed. A recent systematic review found that LPLC reduced pain; however, many of the randomised control trials were at a high risk of bias and the overall quality of evidence was low.
Methods: One hundred patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomised to a LPLC (8 mmHg) or a standard pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy (12 mmHg) (SPLC) with surgeons and anaesthetists blinded to the pressure. Pressures were increased if vision was compromised. Primary outcomes were post-operative pain and analgesia requirements at 4-6 h and 24 h.
Results: Intra-operative visibility was significantly reduced in LPLC (p<0.01) resulting in a higher number of operations requiring the pressure to be increased (29% vs 8%, p=0.010); however, there were no differences in length of operation or post-operative outcomes. Pain scores were comparable at all time points across all pressures; however, recovery room fentanyl requirement was more than four times higher when comparing 8 to 12 mmHg (12.5mcg vs 60mcg, p=0.047). Nausea and vomiting was also higher when comparing these pressures (0/36 vs 7/60, p=0.033). Interestingly, when surgeons estimated the operating pressure, they were correct in only 69% of cases.
Conclusion: Although pain scores were similar, there was a significant reduction in fentanyl requirement and nausea/vomiting in LPLC. Although LPLC compromised intra-operative visibility requiring increased pressure in some cases, there was no difference in complications, suggesting LPLC is safe and beneficial to attempt in all patients.
Trial registration: Registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000205134).
Keywords: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum; Post-operative pain; Standard pressure pneumoperitoneum; Surgeon visibility.
© 2021. Crown.
References
-
- Ahn Y, Woods J, Connor S (2011) A systematic review of interventions to facilitate ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB 13:677-686 - DOI
-
- Watters D (2016) Clinical Variation: Procedure in profile: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Surgical News 17:38 [available from: https://umbraco.surgeons.org/media/1415/art-2016-1404-1401-surgical-news... . Accessed 16th of November 2020]
-
- Yasir M, Mehta KS, Banday VH, Aiman A, Masood I, Iqbal B (2012) Evaluation of post operative shoulder tip pain in low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgeon 10:71-74 - DOI
-
- Bhattacharjee HK, Jalaludeen A, Bansal V, Krishna A, Kumar S, Subramanium R, Ramachandran R, Misra M (2017) Impact of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on shoulder pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Surg Endosc 31:1287-1295 - DOI
-
- Cheng Z-J, Wang Y-B, Chen L, Gong J-P, Zhang W (2018) Effects of Different Levels of Intra-Abdominal Pressure on the Postoperative Hepatic Function of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 28:275-281 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical