Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;54(1):315-325.
doi: 10.1002/jmri.27527. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

Maintaining Image Quality While Reducing Acoustic Noise and Switched Gradient Field Exposure During Lumbar MRI

Anton Glans  1   2 , Jonna Wilén  2 , Lenita Lindgren  1
Affiliations

Maintaining Image Quality While Reducing Acoustic Noise and Switched Gradient Field Exposure During Lumbar MRI

Anton Glans et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: MR-generated acoustic noise can contribute to patient discomfort and potentially be harmful. One way to reduce this noise is by altering the gradient output and/or waveform using software optimization. Such modifications might influence image quality and switched gradient field exposure, and different techniques appear to affect sound pressure levels (SPLs) to various degrees.

Purpose: To evaluate SPLs, image quality, switched gradient field exposure, and participants' perceived noise levels during two different acoustic noise reduction (ANR) techniques, Quiet Suite (QS) and Whisper Mode (WM), and to compare them with conventional T2-weighted turbo spin echo (T2W TSE) of the lumbar spine.

Design: Prospective.

Subjects: Forty adults referred for lumbar MRI.

Field strength/sequence: Conventional T2W TSE, T2W TSE with QS, and T2W TSE with WM were acquired at 1.5 T.

Assessment: Peak SPL (A-weighted decibels, dBA), perceived noise levels (Borg CR10®-scale), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), three radiologists' qualitative assessments in image quality on an ordinal scale 1-4, switched gradient field exposure (% general public), and gradient currents were measured. Interobserver reliability was reported as percentage agreement.

Statistical tests: Repeated measures ANOVA, Friedman's ANOVA, and Wilcoxon's Signed-Rank Test for acoustic noise measurements and image quality assessments.

Results: Mean peak SPLs were 89.9 dBA, 74.3 dBA, and 78.8 dBA for conventional, QS, and WM, respectively (P < 0.05). Participants perceived QS as the quietest and conventional as the loudest sequence (P < 0.05). No qualitative differences in image quality were seen (P > 0.05), although QS showed significantly improved SNR and CNR (P < 0.05). Switched gradient field exposure was reduced by 66% and 48% for QS and WM, respectively.

Data conclusion: Without degrading image quality, both QS and WM are viable ANR techniques in lumbar T2W TSE. QS provided the lowest SPL, the lowest gradient field exposure and was perceived as the most silent among the three sequences.

Level of evidence: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 5.

Keywords: MRI safety; magnetic field; patient comfort; quiet suite; whisper mode.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McJury M, Shellock FG. Auditory noise associated with MR procedures: A review. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:37-45.
    1. McRobbie D, Moore E, Graves M, Prince M. MRI from picture to proton. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. p 153-154.
    1. Baker MA. Reduction of MRI acoustic noise achieved by manipulation of scan parameters - A study using veterinary MR sequences. Radiography 2013;19:11-16.
    1. Heismann B, Ott M, Grodzki D. Sequence-based acoustic noise reduction of clinical MRI scans. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:1104-1109.
    1. Corcuera-Solano I, Doshi A, Pawha PS, Gui D, Gaddipati A, Tanenbaum L. Quiet PROPELLER MRI techniques match the quality of conventional PROPELLER brain imaging techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1124-1127.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources