Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;34(3):294-300.
doi: 10.1080/09540121.2021.1883515. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

Condom use likelihood within the context of PrEP and TasP among men who have sex with men in Florida: a short report

Affiliations

Condom use likelihood within the context of PrEP and TasP among men who have sex with men in Florida: a short report

Angel B Algarin et al. AIDS Care. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Despite the development of targeted interventions for men who have sex with men, this population continues to comprise the majority of new HIV diagnoses. Though condoms are highly efficacious, some sexually active MSM use sero-sorting as a method of HIV prevention. This study aimed to characterize: (1) differences between partner sero-status and condom use likelihood, and (2) demographic, behavioral, and knowledge-related factors influencing condom use likelihood with varying sero-status partners. Using convenience sampling, 150 sexual and gender minority men completed a survey on PrEP and sexual behaviors. The majority of participants identified as racial/ethnic minorities (51.7%), having 4 years of college or more (52.0%), and being HIV-negative (not on PrEP) (68.8%). Our sample reported the lowest average condom use likelihood with a partner on PrEP (2.93 ± 1.39) and the highest average likelihood with an HIV-positive partner (unknown VL) (4.57 ± 0.98). Age, race/ethnicity, education, HIV-status, and HIV and PrEP knowledge were significantly associated with differences in condom use likelihood. Our findings elucidate the complexity of sero-sorting scenarios and decision-making processes in the context of biomedical HIV prevention. These results may provide insight for future condom use and sero-sorting interventions in the context of biomedical HIV prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2016). PrEP 101. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/44604/cdc_44604_DS1.pdf?
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2019). Anal Sex and HIV Risk. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/analsex.html#:~:text=People%20who%20report%....
    1. Crosby RA (2017). Dealing with pre-exposure prophylaxis-associated condom migration: changing the paradigm for men who have sex with men. Sexual Health, 14(1), 106–110. - PubMed
    1. Davis C, Tang CS, Chan SF, & Noel B (1999). The development and validation of the International AIDS Questionnaire-Chinese Version (IAQ-C). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(3), 481–491.
    1. Eaton LA, Kalichman SC, Kalichman MO, Driffin DD, Baldwin R, Zohren L, & Conway-Washington C (2018). Randomised controlled trial of a sexual risk reduction intervention for STI prevention among men who have sex with men in the USA. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 94(1), 40–45. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources