Is targeted magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy enough for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS ≥3: Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 33565519
- DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1495_20
Is targeted magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy enough for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS ≥3: Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate targeted magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound (MRI/TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy versus systematic prostate biopsy and the two approaches combined for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in our center.
Patients and methods: From September 2018 to June 2020, a total of 161 patients with PI-RADS ≥3 were enrolled in this study. They were randomly to undergo either systematic prostate biopsy (systematic group) or targeted MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy + systematic prostate biopsy (combined group). The clinical data and pathological results of biopsies were analyzed.
Results: The detection rate of PCa by targeted MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy was higher than systematic prostate biopsy (38/81 vs. 33/81) in combinated group, but there was no significantly difference. The PCa detection rate in combinated group was significantly higher than systematic group (47/81 vs. 34/80, P = 0.049). There were 40 patients in combinated group and 22 patients in systematic group diagnosed as csPCa, respectively. The ratio of detected csPCa was much higher in combinated group (P = 0.032). In Gleason score no more than 6, the detected ratio of targeted MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy was significantly lower than systematic biopsies in combinated group (P = 0.044). While, in Gleason score higher than 6, the detected ratios of targeted MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy were all higher than systematic biopsies.
Conclusions: Among patients with PI-RADS ≥ 3, targeted MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy is superior to systematic prostate biopsy in the detection rate of PCa and csPCa, but it still misses some PCa patients, including csPCa. Combining targeted MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy and systematic prostate biopsy can led to more detection of all PCas, especially csPCa.
Keywords: Fusion image; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; transperineal.
Conflict of interest statement
None
Similar articles
-
Early experience with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies under visual transrectal ultrasound guidance in patients suspicious for prostate cancer undergoing repeated biopsy.Scand J Urol. 2015 Feb;49(1):25-34. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.925497. Epub 2014 Jun 12. Scand J Urol. 2015. PMID: 24922550
-
Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):713-20. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 23. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 26116294 Clinical Trial.
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted Biopsy in Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels <20 ng/mL: A Single-Center Study in Northeastern China.Med Sci Monit. 2021 Aug 8;27:e930234. doi: 10.12659/MSM.930234. Med Sci Monit. 2021. PMID: 34365459 Free PMC article.
-
Elastic Versus Rigid Image Registration in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Mar;4(2):219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 29. Eur Urol Focus. 2018. PMID: 28753777
-
Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided prostate biopsy: Current status of the cancer detection and the prospects of tailor-made medicine of the prostate cancer.Investig Clin Urol. 2019 Jan;60(1):4-13. doi: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.1.4. Epub 2018 Dec 27. Investig Clin Urol. 2019. PMID: 30637355 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic performance of multiple ultrasonic modalities for prostate cancer.Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 May 11;80:100680. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100680. eCollection 2025. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025. PMID: 40354752 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Long-term Oncological Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy-A 12-year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Aug 7;79:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.07.005. eCollection 2025 Sep. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025. PMID: 40823001 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying Optimal Prostate Biopsy Strategy for the Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) in Biopsy-Naïve Population.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 29;17(3):458. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030458. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39941825 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous