Similar articles

• In vitro activity of ampicillin plus sulbactam against anaerobes compared to ampicillin and cefoxitin.

  Heizmann W, Heilmann F, Werner H. Heizmann W, et al. Infection. 1987;15(5):370-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01647747. Infection. 1987. PMID: 3692611
• [Comparative in vitro activity of ampicillin, cefoperazone and their combinations with sulbactam, as well as that of other antibiotics against anaerobic organisms].

  Rezvan SP, Sidorenko SV, Budanov SV. Rezvan SP, et al. Antibiot Khimioter. 1995 Apr;40(4):25-9. Antibiot Khimioter. 1995. PMID: 7654095 Russian.
• A multicentre study to evaluate the effect of sulbactam/ampicillin combination on anaerobic micro-organisms.

  Leone F, Morandotti MG, Mazzella P, Sanna A, Ravizzola G, Colombrita D, Pinzi G, Turano R, Menozzi MG, Lecchini R, et al. Leone F, et al. J Int Med Res. 1990 May-Jun;18(3):191-200. doi: 10.1177/030006059001800303. J Int Med Res. 1990. PMID: 2193834 Clinical Trial.
• A multicenter international study on the activity of sulbactam/ampicillin, ampicillin, and cefoxitin against anaerobic bacteria and introduction of a new model of susceptibility testing in mixed infections.

  Heizmann WR, Heilmann F, Werner H. Heizmann WR, et al. Suppl Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1989;2:7-12; discussion 47-8. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(89)90086-6. Suppl Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1989. PMID: 2679683 Clinical Trial.
• Bacteriological Studies of Venomous Snakebite Wounds in Hangzhou, Southeast China.

  Hu S, Lou Z, Shen Y, Tu M. Hu S, et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Sep 6;107(4):925-929. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1314. Print 2022 Oct 12. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022. PMID: 36067984 Free PMC article. Review.