Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 10;17(2):e1008639.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008639. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Adaptive social contact rates induce complex dynamics during epidemics

Affiliations

Adaptive social contact rates induce complex dynamics during epidemics

Ronan F Arthur et al. PLoS Comput Biol. .

Abstract

Epidemics may pose a significant dilemma for governments and individuals. The personal or public health consequences of inaction may be catastrophic; but the economic consequences of drastic response may likewise be catastrophic. In the face of these trade-offs, governments and individuals must therefore strike a balance between the economic and personal health costs of reducing social contacts and the public health costs of neglecting to do so. As risk of infection increases, potentially infectious contact between people is deliberately reduced either individually or by decree. This must be balanced against the social and economic costs of having fewer people in contact, and therefore active in the labor force or enrolled in school. Although the importance of adaptive social contact on epidemic outcomes has become increasingly recognized, the most important properties of coupled human-natural epidemic systems are still not well understood. We develop a theoretical model for adaptive, optimal control of the effective social contact rate using traditional epidemic modeling tools and a utility function with delayed information. This utility function trades off the population-wide contact rate with the expected cost and risk of increasing infections. Our analytical and computational analysis of this simple discrete-time deterministic strategic model reveals the existence of an endemic equilibrium, oscillatory dynamics around this equilibrium under some parametric conditions, and complex dynamic regimes that shift under small parameter perturbations. These results support the supposition that infectious disease dynamics under adaptive behavior change may have an indifference point, may produce oscillatory dynamics without other forcing, and constitute complex adaptive systems with associated dynamics. Implications for any epidemic in which adaptive behavior influences infectious disease dynamics include an expectation of fluctuations, for a considerable time, around a quasi-equilibrium that balances public health and economic priorities, that shows multiple peaks and surges in some scenarios, and that implies a high degree of uncertainty in mathematical projections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Discrete-time SIS (blue) and continuous-time SIS (orange) dynamics for delays Δ = 0 to Δ = 5.
N = 10, 000, b0 = 0.05, γ = 0.08, c^=0.0015, α = 0.375, and I0 = 1. Here the epidemic equilibrium is I^=35.72.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Effect of initial number of infecteds I0 on the dynamics for delay Δ = 2.
Discrete- and continuous-time results are in blue and orange, respectively. Other parameters as in Fig 1. As in Fig 1, I^=35.72.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Effect of baseline contact rate b0 on dynamics with delay Δ = 3.
Other parameters as in Fig 1 with I0 = 1. Discrete- and continuous-time results are in blue and orange, respectively. Note that α changes with b0 as α = b0 α2/2α1: (A) α = 0.0375; (B) α = 0.075; (C) α = 0.225; (D) α = 0.3; (E) α = 0.375; (F) α = 0.75.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Effect of removal rate γ on dynamics with delay Δ = 3.
Discrete- and continuous-time results are in blue and orange, respectively. Other parameters as in Fig 1 with I0 = 1.

References

    1. Bauch CT, Galvani AP. Social factors in epidemiology. Science. 2013;342(6154):47–49. 10.1126/science.1244492 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferguson N. Capturing human behaviour. Nature. 2007;446(7137):733–733. 10.1038/446733a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eichenbaum MS, Rebelo S, Trabandt M. The macroeconomics of epidemics National Bureau of Economic Research. 2020.
    1. Funk S, Salathe M, Jansen VAA. Modelling the influence of human behaviour on the spread of infectious diseases: a review. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2010;750:1247–1256. 10.1098/rsif.2010.0142 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reluga TC, Bauch CT, Galvani AP. Evolving public perceptions and stability in vaccine uptake. Mathematical Biosciences. 2006;204(2):185–198. 10.1016/j.mbs.2006.08.015 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types