Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;12(1):82-89.
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722220. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

Validating the Matching of Patients in the Linkage of a Large Hospital System's EHR with State and National Death Databases

Rebecca B N Conway  1 , Matthew G Armistead  2 , Michael J Denney  2 , Gordon S Smith  3
Affiliations

Validating the Matching of Patients in the Linkage of a Large Hospital System's EHR with State and National Death Databases

Rebecca B N Conway et al. Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Though electronic health record (EHR) data have been linked to national and state death registries, such linkages have rarely been validated for an entire hospital system's EHR.

Objectives: The aim of the study is to validate West Virginia University Medicine's (WVU Medicine) linkage of its EHR to three external death registries: the Social Security Death Masterfile (SSDMF), the national death index (NDI), the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR).

Methods: Probabilistic matching was used to link patients to NDI and deterministic matching for the SSDMF and DHHR vital statistics records (WVDMF). In subanalysis, we used deaths recorded in Epic (n = 30,217) to further validate a subset of deaths captured by the SSDMF, NDI, and WVDMF.

Results: Of the deaths captured by the SSDMF, 59.8 and 68.5% were captured by NDI and WVDMF, respectively; for deaths captured by NDI this co-capture rate was 80 and 78%, respectively, for the SSDMF and WVDMF. Kappa statistics were strongest for NDI and WVDMF (61.2%) and NDI and SSDMF (60.6%) and weakest for SSDMF and WVDMF (27.9%). Of deaths recorded in Epic, 84.3, 85.5, and 84.4% were captured by SSDMF, NDI, and WVDMF, respectively. Less than 2% of patients' deaths recorded in Epic were not found in any of the death registries. Finally, approximately 0.2% of "decedents" in any death registry re-emerged in Epic at least 6 months after their death date, a very small percentage and thus further validating the linkages.

Conclusion: NDI had greatest validity in capturing deaths in our EHR. As a similar, though slightly less capture and agreement rate in identifying deaths is observed for SSDMF and state vital statistics records, these registries may be reasonable alternatives to NDI for research and quality assurance studies utilizing entire EHRs from large hospital systems. Investigators should also be aware that there will be a very tiny fraction of "dead" patients re-emerging in the EHR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References

    1. Ballard D J, Ogola G, Fleming N S. Impact of a standardized heart failure order set on mortality, readmission, and quality and costs of care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22(06):437–444. - PubMed
    1. Fleming N S, Ogola G, Ballard D J. Implementing a standardized order set for community-acquired pneumonia: impact on mortality and cost. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35(08):414–421. - PubMed
    1. National Technical Information Service . Alexandria, VA: National Technical Service; 2011. Important Notice: Change in Public Death Master File Records.
    1. da Graca B, Filardo G, Nicewander D. Consequences for healthcare quality and research of the exclusion of records from the Death Master File. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(01):124–128. - PubMed
    1. Maynard C.Changes in the completeness of the social security death masterfile: a case studyThe International Journey of Epidemiology. 2013;11(02). Available at:http://ispub.com/IJE/11/2/1604

Publication types