Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 8;18(4):1602.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041602.

Measuring and Assessing Fluctuating and Authentic-Durable Happiness in Italian Samples

Affiliations

Measuring and Assessing Fluctuating and Authentic-Durable Happiness in Italian Samples

Lucia Monacis et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

On the basis of the self-centeredness and selflessness model, a new instrument assessing two distinct dimensions of happiness, fluctuating and authentic-durable, was developed. The current research aimed at examining the factor structure of the Italian version of the instrument, its psychometric properties and construct validity. To this end, two studies were carried out. Study 1 (N = 544) examined different measurement models, from unidimensional to multidimensional, from a fully symmetrical bifactor solution to a bifactor (S-1) solution. Findings indicated better and adequate fit indices for the last model. Using various samples (n = 1274) Study 2 confirmed the bifactor (S-1) structure and analysed psychometric properties, convergent and divergent validity and temporal stability of the instrument. Findings generally gave evidence of the multidimensional conceptualization of the construct, good levels of reliability values and adequate convergent validity of both scales. Discriminant validity showed mixed results from no association of age with authentic-durable happiness to weak and negative association with fluctuating happiness. Test-retest reliability displayed an adequate value of correlation coefficient for the two set scores of the authentic dimension and a value below the recommended cut-off criteria for the fluctuating dimension, where significant differences in the mean scores emerged. Future studies should aim to replicate the results of this research and attempt to overcome its limitations.

Keywords: convergent and discriminant validity; factor structure; happiness; measurement models; psychometric properties; temporal stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Path diagram of the bifactor solution GRF = General Reference Factor, Contentment; SRF1 = Specific Residual Factor, Fluctuating factor; SRF2 = Specific Residual Factor, Inner-peace.

References

    1. Seligman M., Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: An introduction. Am. Psychol. 2000;55:5–14. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boniwell I., David S.A., Ayers A.C., editors. The Oxford Handbook of Happiness. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2013. Introduction; pp. 1–9. - DOI
    1. Kahneman D., Diener E., Schwarz N. Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. Russell Sage Found; New York, NY, USA: 1999.
    1. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001;52:141–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waterman A.S. Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1993;64:678–691. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678. - DOI