Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;22(2):126-133.
doi: 10.1177/1527154421989609. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

Medicinal Cannabis: Policy, Patients, and Providers

Jennie E Ryan  1 , Sean Esteban McCabe  2 , Carol J Boyd  2
Affiliations

Medicinal Cannabis: Policy, Patients, and Providers

Jennie E Ryan et al. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2021 May.

Abstract

Medicinal cannabis is legal in some form in 47 states, 3 United States territories, and the District of Columbia. An estimated three million Americans use cannabis for relief of a variety of illnesses, and this figure is expected to grow based on policy changes. However, cannabis remains illegal at the federal level as a Schedule I drug under the 1970 Controlled Substances Act. Schedule I classification of cannabis has impeded the advancement of research, leaving providers with little evidence-based information to educate their patients. Furthermore, the disparities in individual state laws create significant social and health inequities in gaining access to medicinal cannabis. Conflicting state and federal policies regarding medicinal cannabis create logistical and ethical dilemmas, and all U.S. stakeholders-patients, providers, and health delivery systems-may be impacted by conflicting federal and state policies. This brief addresses the impact of conflicting cannabis policies.

Keywords: Schedule I drug; controlled substances; medicinal cannabis; patients; policy; research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2015). The impact of marijuana policies on youth: Clinical, research, and legal update. Pediatrics, 135(3), 584–587. - PubMed
    1. American Civil Liberties Union. (2014). War comes home: The excessive militarization of American policing.
    1. American Civil Liberties Union (2020) A tale of two countries. Racially targeted arrests in the era of marijuana reform.
    1. Americans for Safe Access. (2019a). 2019 State of the states report. An analysis of medical cannabis access in the United States. https://www.safeaccessnow.org/sos
    1. Americans for Safe Access. (2019b). Facing state or federal charges? https://www.safeaccessnow.org/are_you_facing_state_or_federal_charges

Substances