Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 25:14:613254.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.613254. eCollection 2020.

Analysis of Human Gait Using Hybrid EEG-fNIRS-Based BCI System: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Analysis of Human Gait Using Hybrid EEG-fNIRS-Based BCI System: A Review

Haroon Khan et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

Human gait is a complex activity that requires high coordination between the central nervous system, the limb, and the musculoskeletal system. More research is needed to understand the latter coordination's complexity in designing better and more effective rehabilitation strategies for gait disorders. Electroencephalogram (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) are among the most used technologies for monitoring brain activities due to portability, non-invasiveness, and relatively low cost compared to others. Fusing EEG and fNIRS is a well-known and established methodology proven to enhance brain-computer interface (BCI) performance in terms of classification accuracy, number of control commands, and response time. Although there has been significant research exploring hybrid BCI (hBCI) involving both EEG and fNIRS for different types of tasks and human activities, human gait remains still underinvestigated. In this article, we aim to shed light on the recent development in the analysis of human gait using a hybrid EEG-fNIRS-based BCI system. The current review has followed guidelines of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-Analyses (PRISMA) during the data collection and selection phase. In this review, we put a particular focus on the commonly used signal processing and machine learning algorithms, as well as survey the potential applications of gait analysis. We distill some of the critical findings of this survey as follows. First, hardware specifications and experimental paradigms should be carefully considered because of their direct impact on the quality of gait assessment. Second, since both modalities, EEG and fNIRS, are sensitive to motion artifacts, instrumental, and physiological noises, there is a quest for more robust and sophisticated signal processing algorithms. Third, hybrid temporal and spatial features, obtained by virtue of fusing EEG and fNIRS and associated with cortical activation, can help better identify the correlation between brain activation and gait. In conclusion, hBCI (EEG + fNIRS) system is not yet much explored for the lower limb due to its complexity compared to the higher limb. Existing BCI systems for gait monitoring tend to only focus on one modality. We foresee a vast potential in adopting hBCI in gait analysis. Imminent technical breakthroughs are expected using hybrid EEG-fNIRS-based BCI for gait to control assistive devices and Monitor neuro-plasticity in neuro-rehabilitation. However, although those hybrid systems perform well in a controlled experimental environment when it comes to adopting them as a certified medical device in real-life clinical applications, there is still a long way to go.

Keywords: electroencephalogram; fNIRS; gait; hybrid BCI; lower extremity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hybrid BCI system block diagram for gait assessment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISMA flowchart of the article selection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
EEG signals used in BCI (Ramadan and Vasilakos, ; Tariq et al., 2018).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Demonstration of neurovascular coupling.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Illustration of bio-sensors placement during gait assessment.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Filter used in fNIRS studies in 2016 (Pinti et al., 2019).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Genetic algorithm process flowchart.

References

    1. Abibullaev B., An J. (2012). Classification of frontal cortex haemodynamic responses during cognitive tasks using wavelet transforms and machine learning algorithms. Med. Eng. Phys. 34, 1394–1410. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.01.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abtahi M., Borgheai S. B., Jafari R., Constant N., Diouf R., Shahriari Y., et al. (2020). Merging fNIRS-EEG brain monitoring and body motion capture to distinguish Parkinson's disease. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 28, 1246–1253. 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.2987888 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aghajani H., Garbey M., Omurtag A. (2017). Measuring mental workload with EEG+fNIRS. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11:359. 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00359 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahn S., Jun S. C. (2017). Multi-modal integration of EEG-fNIRS for brain-computer interfaces-current limitations and future directions. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11:503. 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00503 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahn S., Nguyen T., Jang H., Kim J. G., Jun S. C. (2016). Exploring neuro-physiological correlates of drivers' mental fatigue caused by sleep deprivation using simultaneous EEG, ECG, and fNIRS data. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 10:219. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00219 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources