Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 22;55(1):68-80.
doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00285-2. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: Classification Based Treatment Algorithms

Affiliations
Review

Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: Classification Based Treatment Algorithms

Mudit Shah et al. Indian J Orthop. .

Abstract

Supracondylar humerus fractures are the most common fractures around the elbow in children between 4 and 10 years of age. The treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures can vary from conservative treatment to operative treatment depending on the fracture type. All around the world, the most commonly used classification system is the Wilkins-modified Gartland classification of supracondylar humerus fractures. Currently, the decision to operate or conserve the fracture is taken on basis of this classification system. Non-operative treatment for type I fractures and operative treatment for type III fractures have been well-established in literature. The management of type II supracondylar humerus fracture creates confusion in the minds of numerous orthopaedic surgeons around the world. We have tried addressing this using a classification-based treatment algorithm. Other classification systems like the AO classification, Lagrange and Rigault classification and Bahk classification with special reference to special fracture patterns that require attention and pre-op planning have also been mentioned. It is important to understand that operative management of each supracondylar humerus fracture is unique as regards fixation method and it is important to consider the fracture pattern before internal fixation.

Keywords: Classification; Fracture pattern; Supracondylar humerus fracture; Treatment algorithm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Gartland classification
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Type 4 fracture
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Different classical pin configurations
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Special fracture types
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Intra-focal reduction and K-wire fixation

References

    1. Green BM, Stone JD, Bruce RW, Fletcher ND. The use of a transolecranon pin in the treatment of pediatric flexion-type supracondylar humerus fractures. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2017;37(6):e347–e352. - PubMed
    1. Kang S, Kam M, Miraj F, Park S-S. The prognostic value of the fracture level in the treatment of Gartland type III supracondylar humeral fracture in children. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2015;97-B(1):134–140. - PubMed
    1. Omid R, Choi PD, Skaggs DL. Supracondylar humeral fractures in children. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery Series A. 2008;90(5):1121–1132. - PubMed
    1. Lee HY, Kim SJ. Treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children by a pin leverage technique. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery Series B. 2007;89(5):646–650. - PubMed
    1. Vaquero-Picado A, González-Morán G, Moraleda L. Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. EFORT Open Reviews. 2018;3(10):526–540. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources