Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jan 30;13(2):470.
doi: 10.3390/nu13020470.

The Effect of a Combined Gluten- and Casein-Free Diet on Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The Effect of a Combined Gluten- and Casein-Free Diet on Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Amélie Keller et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in the gastrointestinal system and its significance for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), including the significance of adopting a gluten-free and casein-free (GFCF) diet. The objective was to investigate beneficial and safety of a GFCF diet among children with a diagnosis of ASD. We performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and the Cochrane Library up to January 2020 for existing systematic reviews and individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies were included if they investigated a GFCF diet compared to a regular diet in children aged 3 to 17 years diagnosed with ASD, with or without comorbidities. The quality of the identified existing reviews was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). The risk of bias in RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and overall quality of evidence was evaluated using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). We identified six relevant RCTs, which included 143 participants. The results from a random effect model showed no effect of a GFCF diet on clinician-reported autism core symptoms (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.31 (95% Cl. -0.89, 0.27)), parent-reported functional level (mean difference (MD) 0.61 (95% Cl -5.92, 7.14)) or behavioral difficulties (MD 0.80 (95% Cl -6.56, 10.16)). On the contrary, a GFCF diet might trigger gastrointestinal adverse effects (relative risk (RR) 2.33 (95% Cl 0.69, 7.90)). The quality of evidence ranged from low to very low due to serious risk of bias, serious risk of inconsistency, and serious risk of imprecision. Clinical implications of the present findings may be careful consideration of introducing a GFCF diet to children with ASD. However, the limitations of the current literature hinder the possibility of drawing any solid conclusion, and more high-quality RCTs are needed. The protocol is registered at the Danish Health Authority website.

Keywords: autism spectrum disorder; childhood; gluten-free/casein-free diet.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the systematic reviews.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of secondary studies identified in reviews.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flowchart of primary studies.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of comparison: GFCF vs. usual diet, outcome: clinician-reported core symptoms.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot of comparison: GFCF vs. usual diet, outcome: number of children with adverse events/side effects. (A) Risk ratio; (B) Risk difference.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of comparison: GFCF vs. usual diet, outcome: number of children with gastrointestinal discomfort.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forest plot of comparison: GFCF vs. usual diet, outcome: parent-reported functional level (VABS daily living, higher is better).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Forest plot of comparison: GFCF vs. usual diet, outcome: parent-reported child’s behavioral difficulties (CBCL Aggression subscale, lower is better).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Forest plot of comparison: GFCF vs. usual diet, outcome: body mass index.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Risk of bias assessment as assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A plus (+) indicates a low risk of bias, a question mark (?) indicates an unclear risk of bias, and a minus (−) indicates a high risk of bias. The specific type of bias is presented in the top column and the individual studies in the left row.

References

    1. Fakhoury M. Autistic spectrum disorders: A review of clinical features, theories and diagnosis. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2015;43:70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2015.04.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Autism Spectrum Disorders. [(accessed on 27 January 2021)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/autism-spectrum-disorders.
    1. Faras H., Al A.N., Tidmarsh L. Autism spectrum disorders. Ann. Saudi Med. 2010;30:295–300. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.65261. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buie T., Campbell D.B., Fuchs G.J., Furuta G.T., III, Levy J., Vandewater J., Whitaker A.H., Atkins D., Bauman M.L., Beaudet A.L., et al. Evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of gastrointestinal disorders in individuals with ASDs: A consensus report. Pediatrics. 2010;125(Suppl. 1):1–18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1878C. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xu G., Snetselaar L.G., Jing J., Liu B., Strathearn L., Bao W. Association of food allergy and other allergic conditions with autism spectrum disorder in children. JAMA Netw. Open. 2018;1:e180279. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0279. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Grants and funding