Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct;39(10):1093-1109.
doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

Measurement Techniques to Resolve and Control Population Dynamics of Mixed-Culture Processes

Affiliations
Review

Measurement Techniques to Resolve and Control Population Dynamics of Mixed-Culture Processes

Ivan Schlembach et al. Trends Biotechnol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Microbial mixed cultures are gaining increasing attention as biotechnological production systems, since they offer a large but untapped potential for future bioprocesses. Effects of secondary metabolite induction and advantages of labor division for the degradation of complex substrates offer new possibilities for process intensification. However, mixed cultures are highly complex, and, consequently, many biotic and abiotic parameters are required to be identified, characterized, and ideally controlled to establish a stable bioprocess. In this review, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of existing measurement techniques for identifying, characterizing, monitoring, and controlling mixed cultures and highlight promising examples. Moreover, existing challenges and emerging technologies are discussed, which lay the foundation for novel analytical workflows to monitor mixed-culture bioprocesses.

Keywords: bioprocess characterization; microbial co-culture; mixed culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interests There are no interests to declare.

Figures

Figure I
Figure I. Schematic Illustration of Offline, Atline and Online Measurement Technologies for Bioprocess Control.
Figure 1
Figure 1. The four levels are identification, characterization, process development, and process control.
Key Figure Four Main Levels of Information to Investigate a Mixed or Co-Culture of Microorganisms
Figure 2
Figure 2. Differentiating between Co-Culture Members.
(A) Natural and synthetic cellular characteristics, which can be analyzed; (B) fluorescence image of a co-culture of Aspergillus terreus GFP1 (green) and Trichoderma reesei RFP1 (red) grown on cellulose (blue autofluorescence). Scale bar = 50 μm. Reproduced, with permission, from Ivan Schlembach.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Optical Measurement Principles and Output of (A) Absorbance, (B) Scattered Light, and (C) (Auto)Fluorescence to Resolve Co-Culture Compositions and Dynamics. Abbreviation: PLS, partial least square.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bertrand S, et al. Metabolite induction via microorganism co-culture: a potential way to enhance chemical diversity for drug discovery. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32:1180–1204. - PubMed
    1. Zuroff TR, et al. Consortia-mediated bioprocessing of cellulose to ethanol with a symbiotic Clostridium phytofermentans/yeast co-culture. Biotechno Biofuels. 2013;6:59 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Minty JJ, et al. Design and characterization of synthetic fungal-bacterial consortia for direct production of isobutanol from cellulosic biomass. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:14592–14597. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shahab RL, et al. Consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulosic biomass to lactic acid by a synthetic fungal-bacterial consortium. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018;115:1207–1215. - PubMed
    1. Brethauer S, Studer MH. Consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose by a microbial consortium. Energy Environ Sci. 2014;7:1446–1453.

Publication types