Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 11;64(5):2691-2704.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01922. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

Unique Molecular Interaction with the Histone Deacetylase 6 Catalytic Tunnel: Crystallographic and Biological Characterization of a Model Chemotype

Affiliations

Unique Molecular Interaction with the Histone Deacetylase 6 Catalytic Tunnel: Crystallographic and Biological Characterization of a Model Chemotype

Olasunkanmi O Olaoye et al. J Med Chem. .

Abstract

Histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) is involved in multiple regulatory processes, ranging from cellular stress to intracellular transport. Inhibition of aberrant HDAC6 activity in several cancers and neurological diseases has been shown to be efficacious in both preclinical and clinical studies. While selective HDAC6 targeting has been pursued as an alternative to pan-HDAC drugs, identifying truly selective molecular templates has not been trivial. Herein, we report a structure-activity relationship study yielding TO-317, which potently binds HDAC6 catalytic domain 2 (Ki = 0.7 nM) and inhibits the enzyme function (IC50 = 2 nM). TO-317 exhibits 158-fold selectivity for HDAC6 over other HDAC isozymes by binding the catalytic Zn2+ and, uniquely, making a never seen before direct hydrogen bond with the Zn2+ coordinating residue, His614. This novel structural motif targeting the second-sphere His614 interaction, observed in a 1.84 Å resolution crystal structure with drHDAC6 from zebrafish, can provide new pharmacophores for identifying enthalpically driven, high-affinity, HDAC6-selective inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Currently known HDAC6 inhibitors. The structural features involve a hydroxamic acid which is required for Zn2+ binding, and a linker that connects the hydroxamic acid to a cap group. a) Currently known inhibitors achieved HDAC6 selectivity by replacing the benzene substituent on SAHA with a bulkier, usually hydrophobic cap group. b) Previous studies showed compound 1 is a nM inhibitor against HDAC6 exhibiting limited selectivity c) Current studies show TO-317 adopts a rotatable cap group with two aromatic substituents that occupy the HDAC6 surface facilitating specific residue interactions. *IC50 values were determined using an activity-based electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) by Nanosyn Inc., USA.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Overlaid Inhibition curves for TO-317 against a panel of 11 Zn2+-based HDAC homologs. TO-317 shows in vitro HDAC6 selectivity across all Zn2+-dependent HDAC homologs and becomes a viable candidate for further biological investigation of the HDAC6 enzyme.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Docking conformation of TO-317 with drHDAC6 CD2 (PDB 5WGI) reveals occupancy of both L1 and L2 crevices which facilitates a plethora of interactions. Deck A shows the pocket view of these interactions, while deck B shows how TO-317 adopts a windmill conformation that allows both aromatic ring cap groups to engage with the L1 and L2 crevices of the HDAC6 outer surface.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Stereo-view of a Polder omit map (contoured at 4.0σ) showing the binding of TO-317 in the active site of HDAC6 (PDB code: 7JOM). The catalytic Zn2+ ion is shown as a grey sphere, the Zn2+ bound water molecule is shown as a red sphere; metal coordination and hydrogen bond interactions are shown as solid and dashed black lines, respectively.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Cellular potency of TO-317 and Citarinostat (positive control) in 12 cell lines (1 heathy cell, MRC-9 included). TO-317 shows anti-proliferative potency across different cancer cells with minimal activity in healthy cells. IC50 values are indicated above each graph and reported in μM. IC50 values with their 95% confidence intervals are reported in Table S3.
Figure 6:
Figure 6:
TO-317 shows superior HDAC6 selectivity and potency in MV4–11 and MM.1S cells. (A) MV4–11 cells treated with increasing doses (0.25 μM - 1 μM) of Citarinostat and TO-317 show accumulation of Ac-α-tubulin for TO-317 at 0.25 μM but not for Citarinostat. (B) Similar dose-dependent responses were observed for both inhibitors in MM.1S cells.
Figure 7:
Figure 7:
Quantification of Ac-α-tubulin and Ac-histone levels in immunofluorescence assay. DMSO was used as a negative control in each cohort, and Citarinostat was the positive control. Result indicates that TO-317 induces a clear dose-dependent increase in acetylated α-tubulin with minimal cellular accumulation of acetylated histones under the same dosing concentrations. Data reported above are an average of duplicate experiments.
Figure 8:
Figure 8:
MV4–11 treated with TO-317 (Panel A) and Citarinostat (Panel B) leads to dose-dependent programmed cell death. Death by necrosis (Q1) is minimal and consistent at all doses. Dose-dependent cell death by TO-317 is consistent with a mechanistic approach of cell cycle arrest leading to apoptosis and corroborates the previously observed superior anti-proliferative activity of TO-317 over Citarinostat, the positive control. Data reported above are an average of duplicate experiments, and quantification of each cell population with the associated standard deviation is reported graphically in Fig. S8-A & Fig. S8-B.
Figure 9:
Figure 9:
ROS generation in MV4–11 following incubation with 10 μM TO-317 for up to 4 h. TO-317 shows markedly increased levels of ROS after 2 h incubation which continues to increase up to the 4 h incubation time tested. Data reported is an average of duplicate studies.
Figure 10:
Figure 10:
TO-317 is stable in vivo with a t1/2 (avg) = 1.7 h. Male BALB/c mice were dosed TO-317 intraperitoneally (50 mg/mL solution 5% DMSO, 30% PEG400, 1% Tween80 & 64% saline) and peaks were detected and quantified from collected blood samples at different time concentrations using a triple-quad LC-MS/MS.

References

    1. Hackanson B; Rimmele L; Benkißer M; Abdelkarim M; Fliegauf M; Jung M; Lübbert M HDAC6 as a Target for Antileukemic Drugs in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Leukemia Research 2012, 36 (8), 1055–1062. 10.1016/j.leukres.2012.02.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Santo L; Hideshima T; Kung AL; Tseng JC; Tamang D; Yang M; Jarpe M; Van Duzer JH; Mazitschek R; Ogier WC; et al. Preclinical Activity, Pharmacodynamic, and Pharmacokinetic Properties of a Selective HDAC6 Inhibitor, ACY-1215, in Combination with Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma. Blood 2012, 119 (11), 2579–2589. 10.1182/blood-2011-10-387365. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang Z; Tang F; Hu P; Wang Y; Gong J; Sun S; Xie C HDAC6 Promotes Cell Proliferation and Confers Resistance to Gefitinib in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Oncology Reports 2016, 36 (1), 589–597. 10.3892/or.2016.4811. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ho TCS; Chan AHY; Ganesan A Thirty Years of HDAC Inhibitors: 2020 Insight and Hindsight. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (21), 12460–12484. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00830. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang P; Wang Z; Liu J Role of HDACs in Normal and Malignant Hematopoiesis. Molecular Cancer. 2020. 10.1186/s12943-019-1127-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources