Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Dec 1;60(12):5517-5526.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab149.

Low-dose glucocorticoids should be withdrawn or continued in systemic lupus erythematosus? A systematic review and meta-analysis on risk of flare and damage accrual

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Low-dose glucocorticoids should be withdrawn or continued in systemic lupus erythematosus? A systematic review and meta-analysis on risk of flare and damage accrual

Lanlan Ji et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the risk of flare and damage accrual after discontinuation of low-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) in SLE.

Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases from inception to July 2020 for studies concerning relapses/damage accrual in SLE patients. Pooled incidence rates of flare and time to flare with their 95% CIs after GC withdrawal were calculated. The summary risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI of flare/organ damage accrual risk were computed using a random- or fixed-effects model.

Results: A total of 738 SLE patients with GC discontinuation in 17 publications were eligible for the final analysis. In the primary meta-analysis, the pooled incidence of flare was 24% (95% CI 21, 27) and 13% (95% CI 8, 18) for global and major flares, respectively. Pooled time to flare was 21.08 months (95% CI 9.32, 32.85). In the secondary meta-analysis, GC discontinuation showed an increased risk of flare compared with GC continuation [RR 1.38 (95% CI 1.01, 1.89)], but the risk of major flares was not increased [RR 1.77 (95% CI 0.40, 7.83)]. Moreover, GC withdrawal was associated with a borderline risk reduction in the SLICC/ACR damage index increase compared with GC continuation [RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.38, 1.09)].

Conclusion: GC discontinuation leads to a slightly increased risk of flare, however, no increase in major flare and a borderline reduction of risk in further damage in SLE patients. Baseline screening for candidate patients and long-term follow-up after GC withdrawal are needed to reliably evaluate the organ damage increase.

Keywords: damage; flare; glucocorticoid; systemic lupus erythematosus; withdrawal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances