Septic shock: a microcirculation disease
- PMID: 33577205
- DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000957
Septic shock: a microcirculation disease
Abstract
Purpose of review: The aim of this study was to discuss the implication of microvascular dysfunction in septic shock.
Recent findings: Resuscitation of sepsis has focused on systemic haemodynamics and, more recently, on peripheral perfusion indices. However, central microvascular perfusion is altered in sepsis and these alterations often persist despite normalization of various macro haemodynamic resuscitative goals. Endothelial dysfunction is a key element in sepsis pathophysiology. It is responsible for the sepsis-induced hypotension. In addition, endothelial dysfunction is also implicated involved in the activation of inflammation and coagulation processes leading to amplification of the septic response and development of organ dysfunction. It also promotes an increase in permeability, mostly at venular side, and impairs microvascular perfusion and hence tissue oxygenation.Microvascular alterations are characterized by heterogeneity in blood flow distribution, with adequately perfused areas in close vicinity to not perfused areas, thus characterizing the distributive nature of septic shock. Such microvascular alterations have profound implications, as these are associated with organ dysfunction and unfavourable outcomes. Also, the response to therapy is highly variable and cannot be predicted by systemic hemodynamic assessment and hence cannot be detected by classical haemodynamic tools.
Summary: Microcirculation is a key element in the pathophysiology of sepsis. Even if microcirculation-targeted therapy is not yet ready for the prime time, understanding the processes implicated in microvascular dysfunction is important to prevent chasing systemic hemodynamic variables when this does not contribute to improve tissue perfusion.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Sepsis and septic shock-is a microcirculation a main player?Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2016;48(4):261-265. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2016.0037. Epub 2016 Sep 23. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2016. PMID: 27660252 Review.
-
What is microcirculatory shock?Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Jun;21(3):245-52. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000196. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015. PMID: 25827583 Review.
-
ALTERED MICROCIRCULATION IN SEPTIC SHOCK.Georgian Med News. 2015 Jul-Aug;(244-245):16-24. Georgian Med News. 2015. PMID: 26177130 Review.
-
Changes in Cytokines, Haemodynamics and Microcirculation in Patients with Sepsis/Septic Shock Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Blood Purification with CytoSorb.Blood Purif. 2020;49(1-2):107-113. doi: 10.1159/000502540. Epub 2019 Aug 21. Blood Purif. 2020. PMID: 31434083 Clinical Trial.
-
Hemodynamic coherence in sepsis.Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Dec;30(4):453-463. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Nov 5. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2016. PMID: 27931649 Review.
Cited by
-
Eugene M Renkin. His Many Contributions to Microvascular Research With Examples of How They Inform Current Investigations of Microvascular Dysfunction.Microcirculation. 2025 May;32(4):e70010. doi: 10.1111/micc.70010. Microcirculation. 2025. PMID: 40402867 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical Effect of Norepinephrine Combined with Esmolol Treatment in Patients with Septic Shock and Its Impact on Prognosis.Int J Gen Med. 2024 Sep 23;17:4325-4333. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S477593. eCollection 2024. Int J Gen Med. 2024. PMID: 39346634 Free PMC article.
-
The Value of Serum Procalcitonin, Thromboelastography Combined with Platelet Count in Predicting the Short-Term Progression of Septic Shock in the Intensive Care Unit.Int J Gen Med. 2024 Jul 31;17:3361-3370. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S464566. eCollection 2024. Int J Gen Med. 2024. PMID: 39100724 Free PMC article.
-
The Mechanisms of Sepsis Induced Coagulation Dysfunction and Its Treatment.J Inflamm Res. 2025 Feb 3;18:1479-1495. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S504184. eCollection 2025. J Inflamm Res. 2025. PMID: 39925935 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Catecholamine-Refractory Shock: A Narrative Review.Cureus. 2025 Jun 17;17(6):e86224. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86224. eCollection 2025 Jun. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40677474 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40:1795–1815.
-
- Weil MH, Shubin H. Proposed reclassification of shock states with special reference to distributive defects. Adv Exp Med Biol 1971; 23:13–23.
-
- Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1726–1734.
-
- Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43:304–377.
-
- Beach JM, McGahren ED, Duling BR. Capillaries and arterioles are electrically coupled in hamster cheek pouch. Am J Physiol 1998; 275:H1489–H1496.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials