Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;17(10):e1551-e1558.
doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00816. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

Evaluation of an Interprofessional Training Program to Improve Cancer Drug Therapy Safety

Affiliations

Evaluation of an Interprofessional Training Program to Improve Cancer Drug Therapy Safety

Michelle L Aebersold et al. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Drug therapy for cancer is a high-risk, high-volume clinical intervention that requires interprofessional teams. Given the complexity of anticancer drug therapy and safety concerns, an interdisciplinary team developed a novel training program for oncology registered nurses and pharmacists to improve cancer drug safety.

Methods: Participants completed preworkshop learning assessments and received access to web-based modules on six topics: hazardous drug handling, drug extravasation, hypersensitivity reaction management, sepsis recognition, immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicities, and oral oncolytic adherence. In a 7-hour workshop, participants applied module content in interactive exercises and high-fidelity simulations. Preworkshop and postworkshop questionnaires assessed changes in knowledge and confidence in each topic. Program satisfaction and changes to clinical practice or policies were assessed 3 months after the workshop.

Results: Two hundred ninety-two nurses and 82 pharmacists applied to participate, and 103 (35%) and 44 (54%) have participated, respectively. Long-term follow-up data were available on 133 (90%) participants. Change scores in confidence to meet program objectives increased between pre- and postworkshop (range of increase 0.6-0.8, P < .01). Knowledge scores increased significantly between pre- and postworkshop (average improvement of 3.2 points, P < .01). Overall program satisfaction was high (mean 5.0, standard deviation [0.2] on a five-point scale). Seventy-seven (60%) reported that they had made at least one clinical practice or institutional policy change at 3 months.

Conclusion: An interprofessional education program with online modules, in-person interactive sessions, and simulation activities is a promising strategy to deliver cancer drug safety content to practicing oncology clinicians.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Karen B. FarrisConsulting or Advisory Role: QuiO, Birth Control PharmacistsResearch Funding: AstraZeneca MiKaela OlsenHonoraria: Becton DickinsonConsulting or Advisory Role: Beckinson and DickersonTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Becton Dickinson Christopher R. FrieseConsulting or Advisory Role: RTI Health Solutions, LillyResearch Funding: Merck, National Comprehensive Cancer Network/PfizerOther Relationship: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Self-reported confidence in delivering cancer drug therapy safely (N = 147). Confidence to deliver cancer drug therapies safely was evaluated on a five-point Likert scale, with 1 = not at all confident to 5 = completely confident. A paired t-test was used to evaluate changes at the time of workshop enrollment and immediately following the in-person workshop.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Comparison of knowledge scores before and 3 months after the workshop (N = 133). Nurse and pharmacist participants completed a 25-item knowledge assessment at the time of workshop enrollment and 3 months after workshop completion. Average knowledge scores are shown for nurses, pharmacists, and all participants before and after the workshop.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics : Ambulatory health care data. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd.htm
    1. Neuss MN, Polovich M, McNiff K, et al. : 2013 updated American Society of Clinical Oncology/Oncology Nursing Society chemotherapy administration safety standards including standards for the safe administration and management of oral chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum 40:225-233, 2013 - PubMed
    1. Jacobson JO, Polovich M, McNiff KK, et al. : American Society of Clinical oncology/Oncology Nursing Society chemotherapy administration safety standards. Oncol Nurs Forum 36:651-658, 2009 - PubMed
    1. Gilmore TR, Schulmeister L, Jacobson JO: Quality oncology practice initiative certification program: Measuring implementation of chemotherapy administration safety standards in the outpatient oncology setting. J Oncol Pract 9:14s-18s, 2013. (2 suppl) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association : Further Defining the Scope of Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Practice. Chicago, IL, Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association, 2019

Publication types