Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 12;21(1):157.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07885-7.

Preoperative nutritional risk index and postoperative one-year skeletal muscle loss can predict the prognosis of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma: a registry-based study

Affiliations

Preoperative nutritional risk index and postoperative one-year skeletal muscle loss can predict the prognosis of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma: a registry-based study

Kyung Won Kim et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with gastric cancer have an increased nutritional risk and experience a significant skeletal muscle loss after surgery. We aimed to determine whether muscle loss during the first postoperative year and preoperative nutritional status are indicators for predicting prognosis.

Methods: From a gastric cancer registry, a total of 958 patients who received curative gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy for stage 2 and 3 gastric cancer and survived longer than 1 year were investigated. Clinical and laboratory data were collected. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was assessed based on the muscle area at the L3 level on abdominal computed tomography.

Results: Preoperative nutritional risk index (NRI) and postoperative decrement of SMI (dSMI) were significantly associated with overall survival (hazards ratio: 0.976 [95% CI: 0.962-0.991] and 1.060 [95% CI: 1.035-1.085], respectively) in a multivariate Cox regression analysis. Recurrence, tumor stage, comorbidity index were also significant prognostic indicators. Kaplan-Meier analyses exhibited that patients with higher NRI had a significantly longer survival than those with lower NRI (5-year overall survival: 75.8% vs. 63.0%, P < 0.001). In addition, a significantly better prognosis was observed in a patient group with less decrease of SMI (5-year overall survival: 75.7% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.009). A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the performance of preoperative NRI and dSMI in mortality prediction was quite significant (AUC: 0.63, P < 0.001) and the combination of clinical factors enhanced the predictive accuracy to the AUC of 0.90 (P < 0.001). This prognostic relevance of NRI and dSMI was maintained in patients experiencing tumor recurrence and highlighted in those with stage 3 gastric adenocarcinoma.

Conclusions: Preoperative NRI is a predictor of overall survival in stage 2 or 3 gastric cancer patients and skeletal muscle loss during the first postoperative year was significantly associated with the prognosis regardless of relapse in stage 3 tumors. These factors could be valuable adjuncts for accurate prediction of prognosis in gastric cancer patients.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; Muscle loss; Nutrition; Prognosis; Sarcopenia; Surgery; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the patient selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier curves showing the survival differences between two risk groups defined by NRI and skeletal muscle loss. In the whole patient group, patients were dichotomized by the median value of NRI (a) and dSMI (b). A subgroup analysis was undertaken in the recurrence group and patients were divided according to NRI (c) and dSMI (d). By pathologic tumor stage, analyses were performed by two variables in stage 2 (e and f) and stage 3 (g and h) gastric cancer patients
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrating the performance of preoperative NRI and dSMI in predicting mortality and the enhanced performance of prediction was seen when combined with clinical factors in the whole group (a), the recurrence group (b), and stage 3 gastric cancer patient group (c)

References

    1. Bae JM, Park JW, Yang HK, Kim JP. Nutritional status of gastric cancer patients after total gastrectomy. World J Surg. 1998;22(3):254–260. doi: 10.1007/s002689900379. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braga M, Zuliani W, Foppa L, Di Carlo V, Cristallo M. Food intake and nutritional status after total gastrectomy: results of a nutritional follow-up. Br J Surg. 1988;75(5):477–480. - PubMed
    1. Lee K, Kim KW, Lee JB, Shin Y, Jang JK, Yook JH, et al. Impact of remnant stomach volume and anastomosis on nutrition and body composition in gastric cancer patients. Surg Oncol. 2019;31:75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.09.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim KH, Park DJ, Park YS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH. Actual 5-year nutritional outcomes of patients with gastric Cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2017;17(2):99–109. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2017.17.e12. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Noh SH, Park SR, Yang HK, Chung HC, Chung IJ, Kim SW, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): 5-year follow-up of an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1389–1396. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70473-5. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms