Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 12;7(1):14.
doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00217-9.

A randomized intervention involving family to improve communication in breast cancer care

Affiliations

A randomized intervention involving family to improve communication in breast cancer care

Jennifer L Wolff et al. NPJ Breast Cancer. .

Abstract

We examined the effects of a communication intervention to engage family care partners on patient portal (MyChart) use, illness understanding, satisfaction with cancer care, and symptoms of anxiety in a single-blind randomized trial of patients in treatment for breast cancer. Patient-family dyads were recruited and randomly assigned a self-administered checklist to clarify the care partner role, establish a shared visit agenda, and facilitate MyChart access (n = 63) or usual care (n = 55). Interviews administered at baseline, 3, 9 (primary endpoint), and 12 months assessed anxiety (GAD-2), mean FAMCARE satisfaction, and complete illness understanding (4 of 4 items correct). Time-stamped electronic interactions measured MyChart use. By 9 months, more intervention than control care partners registered for MyChart (77.8 % vs 1.8%; p < 0.001) and logged into the patient's account (61.2% vs 0% of those registered; p < 0.001), but few sent messages to clinicians (6.1% vs 0%; p = 0.247). More intervention than control patients viewed clinical notes (60.3% vs 32.7%; p = 0.003). No pre-post group differences in patient or care partner symptoms of anxiety, satisfaction, or complete illness understanding were found. Intervention patients whose care partners logged into MyChart were more likely to have complete illness understanding at 9 months (changed 70.0% to 80.0% vs 69.7% to 54.6%; p = 0.03); symptoms of anxiety were numerically lower (16.7% to 6.7% vs 15.2% to 15.2%; p = 0.24) and satisfaction numerically higher (15.8-16.2 vs 18.0-17.4; p = 0.25). A brief, scalable communication intervention led to greater care partner MyChart use and increased illness understanding among patients with more engaged care partners (NCT03283553).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Participant flow.
Sharing in care CONSORT diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Between group differences in patient and care partner-reported outcomes.
a, c, e Solid black line—Control Patient Dashed black line—Control Care Partner. Solid green line—Intervention Patient. Dashed green line—Intervention Care Partner. b, d, f Solid blue line—Patient with Engaged Care Partner. Dashed blue line—Engaged Care Partner. Solid orange line—Patient without Engaged Care Partner. Dashed orange line—Nonengaged Care Partner. Symptoms of anxiety refer to a cutpoint of 3+ on the GAD-2. Illness understanding ranges from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater illness understanding: we compare participants with ratings of “4”, reflecting “complete illness understanding” with all others. Satisfaction with cancer care is measured using the FAMCARE (range: 0–20) with higher scores reflecting greater satisfaction. Intervention versus control group outcomes: N = 118 (n = 63 intervention, n = 55 control). Intervention group outcomes, stratified by whether the care partner accessed MyChart: N = 63 (n = 30 with an engaged care partner, n = 33 without engaged care partner).

References

    1. Hobbs GS, et al. The role of families in decisions regarding. Cancer Treat. Cancer. 2015;121:1079–1087. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laidsaar-Powell R, et al. Family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: a qualitative study of patient, family, and clinician attitudes and experiences. Patient Educ. Counseling. 2016;99:1146–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kent EE, et al. Caring for caregivers and patients: research and clinical priorities for informal. Cancer Caregiving. Cancer. 2016;122:1987–1995. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Song L, Zhang L, Mood DW. Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials. CA. 2010;60:317–339. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Griffin JM, et al. Effectiveness of family and caregiver interventions on patient outcomes in adults with cancer: a systematic review. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2014;29:1274–1282. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2873-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources