Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;42(4):898-905.
doi: 10.1007/s00246-021-02558-5. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

Can Left Atrioventricular Valve Reduction Index (LAVRI) Predict the Surgical Strategy for Repair of Atrioventricular Septal Defect?

Affiliations

Can Left Atrioventricular Valve Reduction Index (LAVRI) Predict the Surgical Strategy for Repair of Atrioventricular Septal Defect?

Anastasia Schleiger et al. Pediatr Cardiol. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Despite improved survival, surgical treatment of atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) remains challenging. The optimal technique for primary left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) repair and prediction of suitability for biventricular approach in unbalanced AVSD are still controversial. We evaluated the ability of our recently developed echocardiographic left atrioventricular valve reduction index (LAVRI) in predicting LAVV reoperation rate and surgical strategy for unbalanced AVSD. Retrospective echocardiographic analysis was available in 352 of 790 patients with AVSD treated in our institution and included modified atrioventricular valve index (mAVVI), ventricular cavity ratio (VCR), and right ventricle/left ventricle (RV/LV) inflow angle. LAVRI estimates LAVV area after complete cleft closure and was analyzed with regard to surgical strategy in primary LAVV repair and unbalanced AVSD. Of the entire cohort, 284/352 (80.68%) patients underwent biventricular repair and 68/352 (19.31%) patients underwent univentricular palliation. LAVV reoperation was performed in 25/284 (8.80%) patients after surgical correction of AVSD. LAVRI was significantly lower in patients requiring LAVV reoperation (1.92 cm2/m2 [IQR 1.31] vs. 2.89 cm2/m2 [IQR 1.37], p = 0.002) and significantly differed between patients receiving complete and no/partial cleft closure (2.89 cm2/m2 [IQR 1.35] vs. 2.07 cm2/m2 [IQR 1.69]; p = 0.002). Of 82 patients diagnosed with unbalanced AVSD, 14 were suitable for biventricular repair (17.07%). mAVVI, LAVRI, VCR, and RV/LV inflow angle accurately distinguished between balanced and unbalanced AVSD and predicted surgical strategy (all p < 0.001). LAVRI may predict surgical strategy in primary LAVV repair, LAVV reoperation risk, and suitability for biventricular approach in unbalanced AVSD anatomy.

Keywords: Atrioventricular septal defect; Echocardiographic analysis; Left atrioventricular valve repair; Preoperative decision-making; Unbalanced atrioventricular septal defect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare not to have any conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Measurement and calculation of LAVRI. Left anterior oblique view of the common AV valve at end-diastole (a) and systole (b) in a patient with right-dominant unbalanced AVSD. Measurements required for LAVRI calculation: a = major LAVV radius, b = minor LAVV radius, and c = cleft size. LAVV left atrioventricular valve area, LAVRI left atrioventricular valve reduction index
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic drawing of the residual LAVV orifice after complete cleft closure in patients with a LAVRI ≤ 2.0 cm2/m2 (red) and > 2.0 cm2/m2 (blue). LAVV left atrioventricular valve area, LAVRI left atrioventricular valve reduction index
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a LAVRI according to strategy for primary LAVV repair. Patients are divided into two groups based on surgical strategy: Group 1: No/ partial cleft closure (n = 29), group 2: complete cleft closure (n = 142). b LAVRI according to requirement of LAVV reoperation. Patients are divided into patients with (n = 16) and patients without reoperation (n = 155). c LAVRI according to surgical strategy. Patients are divided into two groups: Group 1 UVP (n = 46), Group 2 BVR (n = 171). LAVRI left atrioventricular valve reduction index
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Receiver operating curve analysis of each echocardiographic index concerning prediction of surgical strategy. mAVVI modified atrioventricular valve index, BVR biventricular repair, LAVRI left atrioventricular valve reduction index, RV/LV right ventricular/left ventricular, VCR ventricular cavity ratio, VSD ventricular septal defect

Similar articles

References

    1. Hoohenkerk GJ, Bruggemans EF, Rijlaarsdam M, Schoof PH, Koolbergen DR, Hazekamp MG. More than 30 yearsʼ experience with surgical correction of atrioventricular septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1554–1561. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.06.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ginde S, Lam J, Hill GD, Cohen S, Woods RK, Mitchell ME, et al. Long-term outcomes after surgical repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150:369–374. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.05.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schleiger A, Miera O, Peters B, Schmitt KRL, Kramer P, Buracionok J, Murin P, Cho MY, Photiadis J, Berger F, Ovroutski S. Long-term results after surgical repair of atrioventricular septal defect. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019;28(5):789–796. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy334. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prifti E, Bonacchi M, Baboci A, Giunti G, Krakulli K, Vanini V. Surgical outcome of reoperation due to left atrioventricular valve regurgitation after previous correction of complete atrioventricular septal defect. J Card Surg. 2013;28:756–763. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12231. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hookenkerk GJF, Bruggemans EF, Koolbergen DR, Rijlaarsdam EB, Hazekamp MG. Long-term results of reoperation for left atrioventricular valve regurgitation after correction of atrioventricular septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:849–855. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.09.043. - DOI - PubMed

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources