Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 12;7(1):12.
doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00304-y.

It's Time to Change Direction on Agility Research: a Call to Action

Warren Young  1 , Russell Rayner  2 , Scott Talpey  3
Affiliations

It's Time to Change Direction on Agility Research: a Call to Action

Warren Young et al. Sports Med Open. .

Abstract

Agility is an important skill for both attackers and defenders in invasion sports such as codes of football. On the sporting field, agility requires reacting to a stimulus, often presented by an opponent's movement, before a change of direction or speed. There is a plethora of research that examines the movement component of agility in isolation, which is described as change-of-direction (COD) ability, and this is thought to underpin agility performance. This opinion article proposes that COD ability should not be researched as the only or primary outcome measure when the objective is to inform agility performance in invasion sports. It is argued that pre-planned COD movements and tests lack ecological validity because they lack perception-action coupling and involve movement out of context from the game. The movement techniques and strength qualities required for the performance of COD tests can be quite different to those required for agility. It is suggested that COD tests can be applied to sports that involve pre-planned COD movements, but researchers should endeavour to use agility tests when studying invasion sports. Some new methods for assessing one-on-one agility contests are reported as potentially valuable for future research, and examples of research questions are provided.

Keywords: Agility; Change-of-direction; Invasion sports; Research approaches.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors, Warren Young, Russell Rayner, and Scott Talpey, declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Sheppard JM, Young WB. Agility literature review: classifications, training and testing, J Sports Sci. 2006; 24(9): 919–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500457109 - PubMed
    1. Brughelli M, Cronin J, Levin G, Chaouachi A. Understanding change of direction ability in sport a review of resistance training studies. Sports Med. 2008; 38 (12): 1045-1063. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200838120-00007 - PubMed
    1. Draper JA, Lancaster MG. The 505 test: a test for agility in the horizontal plane. Australian Journal for Science Medicine Sport. 1985;17(1):15–18.
    1. Nimphius S, Callaghan S, Bezodis, N, Lockie RG. Change of direction and agility tests: challenging our current measures of performance. Strength Cond J. 2018; 40(1): 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000309
    1. Young WB, Murray MP. Reliability of a field test of defending and attacking agility in Australian football and relationships to reactive strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2017; 31(2): 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001498 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources