Structural biases that children bring to language learning: A cross-cultural look at gestural input to homesign
- PMID: 33581667
- PMCID: PMC8058290
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104608
Structural biases that children bring to language learning: A cross-cultural look at gestural input to homesign
Abstract
Linguistic input has an immediate effect on child language, making it difficult to discern whatever biases children may bring to language-learning. To discover these biases, we turn to deaf children who cannot acquire spoken language and are not exposed to sign language. These children nevertheless produce gestures, called homesigns, which have structural properties found in natural language. We ask whether these properties can be traced to gestures produced by hearing speakers in Nicaragua, a gesture-rich culture, and in the USA, a culture where speakers rarely gesture without speech. We studied 7 homesigning children and hearing family members in Nicaragua, and 4 in the USA. As expected, family members produced more gestures without speech, and longer gesture strings, in Nicaragua than in the USA. However, in both cultures, homesigners displayed more structural complexity than family members, and there was no correlation between individual homesigners and family members with respect to structural complexity. The findings replicate previous work showing that the gestures hearing speakers produce do not offer a model for the structural aspects of homesign, thus suggesting that children bring biases to construct, or learn, these properties to language-learning. The study also goes beyond the current literature in three ways. First, it extends homesign findings to Nicaragua, where homesigners received a richer gestural model than USA homesigners. Moreover, the relatively large numbers of gestures in Nicaragua made it possible to take advantage of more sophisticated statistical techniques than were used in the original homesign studies. Second, the study extends the discovery of complex noun phrases to Nicaraguan homesign. The almost complete absence of complex noun phrases in the hearing family members of both cultures provides the most convincing evidence to date that homesigners, and not their hearing family members, are the ones who introduce structural properties into homesign. Finally, by extending the homesign phenomenon to Nicaragua, the study offers insight into the gestural precursors of an emerging sign language. The findings shed light on the types of structures that an individual can introduce into communication before that communication is shared within a community of users, and thus sheds light on the roots of linguistic structure.
Keywords: Co-speech gesture; Complex noun phrases; Complex sentences; Homesign; Linguistic input; Nicaraguan Sign Language.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Homesign Research, Gesture Studies, and Sign Language Linguistics: The Bigger Picture of Homesign and Homesigners.Top Cogn Sci. 2025 Jul;17(3):492-507. doi: 10.1111/tops.12766. Epub 2024 Nov 11. Top Cogn Sci. 2025. PMID: 39527498
-
Communicating about quantity without a language model: number devices in homesign grammar.Cogn Psychol. 2013 Aug-Sep;67(1-2):1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jul 17. Cogn Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23872365 Free PMC article.
-
Successful communication does not drive language development: Evidence from adult homesign.Cognition. 2017 Jan;158:10-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Oct 20. Cognition. 2017. PMID: 27771538
-
Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e46. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15001247. Epub 2015 Oct 5. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 26434499 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Statistical evidence that a child can create a combinatorial linguistic system without external linguistic input: Implications for language evolution.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt B):150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.016. Epub 2016 Dec 29. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017. PMID: 28041786 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Parent American Sign Language skills correlate with child-but not toddler-ASL vocabulary size.Lang Acquis. 2024;31(2):85-99. doi: 10.1080/10489223.2023.2178312. Epub 2023 Apr 17. Lang Acquis. 2024. PMID: 38510461 Free PMC article.
-
Profile of Susan Goldin-Meadow.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Dec 3;121(49):e2421379121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2421379121. Epub 2024 Nov 27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 39602269 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Linguacultural and Cognitive Peculiarities of Linguistic Universals.J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Jan 21;53(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10050-3. J Psycholinguist Res. 2024. PMID: 38245906
-
Emergent Morphology in Child Homesign: Evidence from Number Language.Lang Learn Dev. 2022;18(1):16-40. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1922281. Epub 2021 Jun 7. Lang Learn Dev. 2022. PMID: 35603228 Free PMC article.
-
Using computational modeling to validate the onset of productive determiner-noun combinations in English-learning children.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Dec 10;121(50):e2316527121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2316527121. Epub 2024 Nov 21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 39570292 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Behrens H. (2009). Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, 47(2), 383–411.
-
- Brown R, (1973). A First Language: The Early Years. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
- Butcher C, Mylander C, & Goldin-Meadow S. (1991). Displaced communication in a self-styled gesture system: Pointing at the nonpresent. Cognitive Development, 6(3), 315–342.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials