Prognostic Implications of a Novel Algorithm to Grade Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation
- PMID: 33582056
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.12.011
Prognostic Implications of a Novel Algorithm to Grade Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation
Abstract
Objectives: A novel tricuspid regurgitation (TR) grading system, using vena contracta (VC) width and effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA), was proposed and validated based on its prognostic usefulness.
Background: The clinical need of a new grading system for TR has recently been emphasized to depict the whole spectrum of TR severity, particularly beyond severe TR (massive or torrential).
Methods: TR severity was characterized in 1,129 patients with moderate or severe secondary TR (STR). Recently proposed cutoff values of VC width were more effective in differentiating the prognosis of patients with moderate STR, whereas EROA cutoff values performed better in characterizing the risk of patients with more severe STR. Therefore, these 2 parameters were combined into a novel grading system to define moderate (VC <7 mm), severe (VC ≥7 mm and EROA <80 mm2), and torrential (VC ≥7 mm and EROA ≥80 mm2) STR.
Results: A total of 143 patients (13%) showed moderate STR, whereas 536 patients (47%) had severe STR, and 450 (40%) had torrential STR. Patients with torrential STR had larger right ventricular (RV) dimensions, lower RV systolic function, and were more likely to receive diuretics. The cumulative 10-year survival rate was 53% for moderate, 45% for severe, and 35% for torrential STR (p = 0.007). After adjusting for potential confounders, torrential STR retained an association with worse prognosis compared with other STR grades (hazard ratio: 1.245; 95% confidence interval: 1.023 to 1.516; p = 0.029).
Conclusions: A novel STR grading system was able to capture the whole range of STR severity and identified patients with torrential STR who were characterized by a worse prognosis.
Keywords: prognosis; right ventricle; tricuspid regurgitation.
Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
FUNDING SUPPORT AND Author Disclosures This work was funded by an unrestricted research grant from Edwards Lifesciences (IISUSTHV2018017). Dr. Knuuti has received speaker fees from GE Healthcare, Merck, Lundbeck, and Bayer; and study protocol constancy fees from GE Healthcare and AstraZeneca outside of the submitted work. Dr. Bax has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular. Dr. Delgado has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, MSD, Edwards Lifesciences, and GE Healthcare. Dr. Marsan has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and GE Heathcare. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Comment in
-
Categorical Grading of the Severity of Tricuspid Regurgitation and its Association to Patients' Outcome.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jun;14(6):1096-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.03.016. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021. PMID: 34112379 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
