Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb 15;151(Suppl 1):29S-37S.
doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa279.

Review of Experience of the Production of Salt Fortified with Iron and Iodine

Affiliations
Review

Review of Experience of the Production of Salt Fortified with Iron and Iodine

Alister Shields et al. J Nutr. .

Abstract

The double fortification of salt with iodine and iron has been proposed as a method for the mass prevention of iron deficiency anemia. This article reports on the technical and financial aspects of the production of such double fortified salt (DFS) based on the experiences of current and past producers. It draws contrasts with the established process of fortifying salt solely with iodine particularly examining the cost and complexity of the processes involved. Based on these factors it questions the commercial viability of existing DFS formulations and thus their sustainability as vehicles for the widespread distribution of iron outside a subsidized environment. It makes suggestions for the future development of DFS particularly relating to the development of less expensive iron formulations suitable for use with lower quality salts and identifies key technical and economic areas to be taken into account when considering the production of DFS.

Keywords: commercial challenges; cost of fortification; double fortified salt; food fortification; fortificant production; fortification processes; iodine; iron.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The production process for the 2 most common types of DFS. DFS, double fortified salt; EFF, encapsulated ferrous fumarate; FS, ferrous sulfate; NaCl, sodium chloride; SHMP, sodium hexametaphosphate.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Estimated investments for various DFS production scenarios. NB: Feasible = Sustainable, socially and politically acceptable, and economically viable. Source = local or national production and/or importation.DFS, double fortified salt; tpa, metric tons per annum; USD, United States Dollar.

References

    1. Levinson F, Berg A. Proposal to combat malnutrition in India – with a grain of fortified salt. Food Technology. 1969;23:70– 2.
    1. Baxter J-A, Zlotkin S. Compendium of Evidence on Double Fortified Salt. The Micronutrient Initiative; 2014.
    1. University of York. Centre for Industry Education Collaboration. [Internet]. [cited 14 Jan, 2020]. Available from: http://www.essentialchemicalindustry.org/chemicals/iodine.html.
    1. Iodine Global Network. Iodate or Iodide?. [Internet]. [cited 14 Jan, 2020]. Available from: https://www.ign.org/p142000383.html.
    1. Oshinowo T, Diosady LL, Yusufali R, Wesley AS, Mannar MGV. Production of Encapsulated Iron for Double Fortification of Salt with Iodine and Iron. [Internet] Micronutrient Initiative; 2017. Available from: https://www.nutritionintl.org/content/user_files/2017/06/Production-of-E....

Publication types