Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 27;13(1):132-143.
doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i1.132.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and liver biopsy in the evaluation of elevated liver function tests after liver transplantation

Affiliations

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and liver biopsy in the evaluation of elevated liver function tests after liver transplantation

Augustin Attwell et al. World J Hepatol. .

Abstract

Background: Abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) in post-liver transplant (LT) patients pose a challenge in the timing and selection of diagnostic modalities. There are little data regarding the accuracy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and liver biopsy (LB) in diagnosing post-transplant complications.

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ERCP and LB in patients with non-vascular post-LT complications.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study evaluated patients undergoing both ERCP and LB for evaluation of elevated LFTs within 6 mo of LT from 2000 to 2017. Diagnostic operating characteristics including accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for various diagnoses were calculated for ERCP and LB. The R factor (ratio of alkaline phosphatase to alanine aminotransferase) was also calculated for each patient.

Results: Of the 1284 patients who underwent LT, 91 patients (74.7% males, mean age of 51) were analyzed. Anastomotic strictures (AS, 24.2%), acute cellular rejection (ACR, 11%) and concurrent AS/ACR (14.3%) were the most common diagnoses. ERCP carried an accuracy of 79.1% (95%CI: 69.3-86.9), LB had an accuracy of 93.4% (95%CI: 86.2-97.5), and the combination of the two had an accuracy of 100% (95%CI: 96-100). There was no difference between patients with AS and ACR in mean R factor (AS: 1.9 vs ACR: 1.1, P = 0.24). Adverse events did not differ between the two tests (ERCP: 3.1% vs LB: 1.1%, P = 0.31).

Conclusion: In patients with abnormal LFTs after LT without vascular complications, the combination of LB and ERCP carries low risk and improves diagnostic accuracy over either test alone.

Keywords: Abnormal liver tests; Acute cellular rejection; Anastomotic biliary stricture; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Liver biopsy; Liver transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: We have no financial relationships to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Photomicrograph of representative portal tract in acute cellular rejection. Mixed, lymphocyte predominant portal-based inflammation, bile duct inflammation characterized by lymphocyte infiltration (circle), and a large portal venule with subendothelial lymphocyte infiltration and intraluminal lymphocyte tethering[24] (hematoxylin and eosin stain, 40 ×).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cholangiogram during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography demonstrating an anastomotic stricture (arrow).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow diagram of patients. ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Causes of liver test abnormalities after liver transplantation. Legend: Used with permission from Lucey et al[2], 2013. HBV: Hepatitis B virus; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; PBC: Primary biliary cholangitis; PSC: Pulmonary scar cancer.

Similar articles

References

    1. Services USDoHH. Transplants by Donor Type, Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). 2019. Available from: https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/
    1. Lucey MR, Terrault N, Ojo L, Hay JE, Neuberger J, Blumberg E, Teperman LW. Long-term management of the successful adult liver transplant: 2012 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American Society of Transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2013;19:3–26. - PubMed
    1. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2016;64:433–485. - PubMed
    1. Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Liver biopsy. Hepatology. 2009;49:1017–1044. - PubMed
    1. Banff schema for grading liver allograft rejection: an international consensus document. Hepatology. 1997;25:658–663. - PubMed