Resource, Collaborator, or Individual Cow? Applying Q Methodology to Investigate Austrian Farmers' Viewpoints on Motivational Aspects of Improving Animal Welfare
- PMID: 33585598
- PMCID: PMC7873868
- DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.607925
Resource, Collaborator, or Individual Cow? Applying Q Methodology to Investigate Austrian Farmers' Viewpoints on Motivational Aspects of Improving Animal Welfare
Abstract
One keystone to successful welfare improvement endeavors is a respected cooperation between farmer and advisor (e.g., veterinarian), which requires a thorough understanding of what motivates farmer behavior. In this respect, Q methodology offers a promising approach in investigating individual motivational patterns and to discriminate between and describe typologies of farmers. In our study we explored, based on a sample of 34 Austrian dairy farmers, how 39 potentially motivating statements regarding the improvement of dairy cow health and welfare were assessed. We were able to identify and describe four different viewpoints, explaining 47% of total study variance. All four viewpoints have in common that pride in a healthy herd is motivating to work toward improved animal health and welfare to a certain extent, but meeting legal requirements is rather not. Viewpoint 1 acknowledges welfare for economic performance, ease of work and short working hours but does not make allowance for outside interference. Participants loading on Viewpoint 2 also show a focus on economic aspects but, keep close track of the animal welfare debate recognizing its potential to improve the public image of dairy farming. Even though they cautiously criticize an exploitative application of dairy farming, they do not want to be understood as role models. With regards to animal welfare, farmers sharing Viewpoint 3 perceive themselves as superior to and show little reluctance of comparison with mainstream farming. For them, the animal as sentient being itself owns some intrinsic value and it is necessary to strike a balance between economic and other, ethical considerations. Viewpoint 4 perceives cows as equal collaborators who deserve to be treated with respect and appreciation and is willing to accept certain economic losses in order to maintain high standards regarding animal health and welfare. Using Q methodology, we have been able to draw high resolution images of different farmer typologies, enabling advisors to tailor intervention strategies specifically addressing leverage points with a high chance of farmer compliance.
Keywords: Q methodology; cow; dairy; farmer; improvement; motivation; viewpoint; welfare.
Copyright © 2021 Maurer, Schenkenfelder and Winckler.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Dairy farmers' use and non-use values in animal welfare: Determining the empirical content and structure with anchored best-worst scaling.J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jan;99(1):579-92. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9755. Epub 2015 Nov 5. J Dairy Sci. 2016. PMID: 26547638
-
Challenging the myth of the irrational dairy farmer; understanding decision-making related to herd health.N Z Vet J. 2011 Jan;59(1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2011.547162. N Z Vet J. 2011. PMID: 21328151 Review.
-
A Q study: exploring the purpose of transdisciplinary dairy advisory services in Denmark.Acta Vet Scand. 2021 Nov 20;63(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13028-021-00610-1. Acta Vet Scand. 2021. PMID: 34801074 Free PMC article.
-
Dairy farmers' expectations and receptivity regarding animal welfare advice: A focus group study.J Dairy Sci. 2019 Aug;102(8):7385-7397. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15821. Epub 2019 Jun 13. J Dairy Sci. 2019. PMID: 31202646
-
Dairy Farmers' Perceptions of and Actions in Relation to Lameness Management.Animals (Basel). 2019 May 23;9(5):270. doi: 10.3390/ani9050270. Animals (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31126064 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Quantitative analysis of participant perspectives on use of different calf handling and restraint methods for spring processing of beef calves in western Canada.Transl Anim Sci. 2025 Jul 11;9:txaf092. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf092. eCollection 2025. Transl Anim Sci. 2025. PMID: 40822135 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alvergnas M, Strabel T, Rzewuska K, Sell-Kubiak E. Claw disorders in dairy cattle: effects on production, welfare and farm economics with possible prevention methods. Livestock Sci. (2019) 222:54–64. 10.1016/j.livsci.2019.02.011 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources