Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;135(4):1565-1572.
doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02527-w. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

Validation of Roberts' method using root canal width patterns as a mandibular maturity marker in determining the 18-year threshold

Affiliations

Validation of Roberts' method using root canal width patterns as a mandibular maturity marker in determining the 18-year threshold

Christy L Davidson et al. Int J Legal Med. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

The South African Bill of Rights and the Children's Act define a 'child' as a person under the age of 18 years. The age of 18 years is therefore significant for legal purposes in South Africa. The third molar is an important indicator in determining the 18-year threshold. Human biological growth markers are accepted indicators of a subject attaining the age of 18 years. A recent study by Roberts et al. suggested that the relative width of the distal root canals (RCW) of the lower left permanent molars (Fédération Dentaire Internationale notation 36, 37 and 38) as visualised on dental panoramic radiographs can be used as such a growth marker. This study aimed to validate this human biological growth marker in both black and white populations living in South Africa according to Roberts' method. The findings of this validation study were in agreement with this method which showed that individuals with Demirjian stage H left molars and category RCW-C were indeed over the 18-year threshold. Important aspects regarding the rationality and application of Roberts' method are discussed. The authors conclude that this method should not be used in isolation but as an adjunct with other age estimation methods.

Keywords: 18-year threshold; Dental age estimation; Forensic science; Root canal width patterns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 - Chapter 2: Bill of Rights
    1. Ritz-Timme S, Cattaneo C, Collins MJ, Waite ER, Schutz HW, Kaatsch HJ, Borrman HI (2000) Age estimation: the state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practise. Int J Legal Med 113(3):129–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004140050283 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM (1973) A new system of dental age assessment. Ann Hum Biol 45(2):211–227
    1. Gandhi N, Jain S, Kumar M, Rupakar P, Choyal K, Prajapati S (2015) Reliability of third molar development for age estimation in Gujarati population: a comparative study. J Forensic Dent Sci 7(2):107–113. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.156197 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Foltasová L, Krejčí P, Morozova S, Voborná I, Číhalová L (2015) Third molar as age marker in adolescents: large sample sized retrospective study. IOSR -JDMS 14(11):67–71

LinkOut - more resources