Efficacy and safety of 0.01% atropine for prevention of childhood myopia in a 2-year randomized placebo-controlled study
- PMID: 33586090
- DOI: 10.1007/s10384-021-00822-y
Efficacy and safety of 0.01% atropine for prevention of childhood myopia in a 2-year randomized placebo-controlled study
Abstract
Purpose: Atropine eye drops prevent the progression of myopia, but their use has not been tested in the Japanese schoolchildren population. Here, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.01% atropine eye drops for myopia control in Japanese children.
Study design: Multicenter (7 university hospitals), randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial.
Methods: Participants were 171 Japanese schoolchildren aged 6 to 12 years, with progressive myopia, spherical equivalence (SE) of -1.00 to -6.00 diopters (D), and astigmatism of ≤1.5 D. They were randomized to receive either 0.01% atropine (n=85) or placebo (n=86) eye drops once nightly OU for 24 months. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were changes in SE and axial length (AL), respectively, from baseline to month 24.
Results: Data from 168 subjects were analyzed. At month 24, compliance was similar in both groups (atropine: 83.3%; placebo: 85.7%). The least squares mean change in SE and AL from baseline were, respectively, -1.26 D (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.35, -1.17) and 0.63 mm (0.59, 0.67) for atropine and -1.48 D (- 1.57, -1.39) and 0.77 mm (0.73, 0.81) for placebo. Inter-group differences were 0.22 D (95% CI: 0.09, 0.35; P < 0.001) for SE and - 0.14 mm (-0.20, -0.08; P < 0.001) for AL. Three patients experienced mild allergic conjunctivitis side effects, with no inter-group difference in incidence (atropine: 2.4%; 2/84 patients; placebo: 1.4%; 1/84 patients).
Conclusion: With good compliance, 0.01% atropine is effective and safe for preventing the progression of childhood myopia.
Keywords: Eye drop; Muscarinic receptor; Myopia control; Placebo; School children.
References
-
- Saw SM, Matsumura S, Hoang QV. Prevention and management of myopia and myopic pathology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60:488–99. - DOI
-
- Rudnicka AR, Kapetanakis VV, Wathern AK, Logan NS, Gilmartin B, Whincup PH, et al. Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of childhood myopia, a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis: implications for aetiology and early prevention. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:882–90. - DOI
-
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Annual Report of School Health Statistics Research. 2018. http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/toukei/chousa05/hoken/kekka/k_detail/141171... . Accessed 27 Mar 2019.
-
- Takashima T, Yokoyama T, Futagami S, Ohno-Matsui K, Tanaka H, Tokoro T, et al. The quality of life in patients with pathologic myopia. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2001;45:84–92. - DOI
-
- Asakuma T, Yasuda M, Ninomiya T, Noda Y, Arakawa S, Hashimoto S, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for myopic retinopathy in a Japanese population: the Hisayama Study. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1760–5. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
