Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 May;27(2):187-203.
doi: 10.1002/dys.1677. Epub 2021 Feb 14.

Developmental dyslexia and creativity: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Developmental dyslexia and creativity: A meta-analysis

Nadyanna M Majeed et al. Dyslexia. 2021 May.

Abstract

Despite difficulties in reading and writing, some research suggests that dyslexia may be related to higher levels of creativity. However, this pattern is not consistently observed. The current research sought to ascertain whether individuals with clinically diagnosed dyslexia exhibit higher creativity than controls through a meta-analysis. Fourteen studies that assessed the creativity of 397 individuals with clinically diagnosed dyslexia and 453 controls were reviewed. Random-effects meta-analysis revealed an overall non-significant difference in creativity scores between those with dyslexia and controls. Additionally, method factors such as the type of creativity task and whether intelligence was controlled for, as well as sample-related factors such as gender, did not explain differences in the dyslexia-creativity relationship. Nonetheless, individuals with dyslexia significantly outperformed controls in creativity scores in adult samples, but not in younger child/adolescent samples. Overall, the current findings provide limited support for the idea that individuals with dyslexia are more creative, and that past evidence of this relationship may be limited to adult samples.

Keywords: creativity; dyslexia; meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abraham, A., Pieritz, K., Thybusch, K., Rutter, B., Kröger, S., Schweckendiek, J., … Hermann, C. (2012). Creativity and the brain: Uncovering the neural signature of conceptual expansion. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1906-1917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.015
    1. Alexander-Passe, N. (2015). The dyslexia experience: Difference, disclosure, labelling, discrimination and stigma. Asia Pacific Journal of Developmental Differences, 2, 202-233. https://doi.org/10.3850/S2345734115000290
    1. *Alves, R. J. R., & deCássia Nakano, T. (2014). Creativity and intelligence in children with and without developmental dyslexia. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 24(59), 361-369. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272459201410
    1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
    1. Antonietti, A., Giorgetti, M., & Pizzingrilli, P. (2011). Io penso creativo. Valutare e potenziare gli aspetti creativi del pensiero [I think creative. Assess and improve creative aspects of thinking]. Firenze, Italy: Giunti.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources